Diabetes Centre, Isala Clinics, the Netherlands University Medical Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jul 22;173(14):1346-50. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6883.
Biofeedback with device-guided lowering of breathing frequency could be an alternate nonpharmacologic treatment option for hypertension. Evidence from trials with high methodologic quality is lacking.
To evaluate the effects of device-guided lowering of breathing frequency on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension.
Single-center, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.
A large nonacademic teaching hospital in the Netherlands.
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension.
Fifteen-minute sessions with either the device that guides breathing through musical tones to a lower breathing frequency (aiming at <10 breaths/min) or a sham device (music without aiming at lowering of breathing frequency) for an 8-week study period.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured in the physician's office.
Forty-eight patients were randomized; 21 patients (88%) in the intervention group and 24 patients (100%) in the control group completed the study. There were no significant changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, with a difference in systolic blood pressure of 2.35 mm Hg (95% CI, -6.50 to 11.20) in favor of the control group and a difference in diastolic blood pressure of 2.25 mm Hg (95% CI, -2.16 to 6.67) in favor of the intervention group. Three patients in the intervention group experienced adverse events.
This high methodologic quality study shows no significant effect of device-guided lowering of breathing frequency on office-measured blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes. On the basis of this study, together with results from all but one previous trial, device-guided lowering of breathing frequency does not appear to be a viable nonpharmacologic option for hypertension treatment.
带设备的呼吸频率降低的生物反馈可能是高血压的一种替代非药物治疗选择。缺乏高质量方法学试验的证据。
评估设备指导的呼吸频率降低对 2 型糖尿病合并高血压患者血压的影响。
单中心、双盲、假对照试验。
荷兰的一家大型非学术教学医院。
2 型糖尿病合并高血压患者。
为期 8 周的研究期间,进行 15 分钟的治疗,使用设备通过音乐引导呼吸频率降低(目标为 <10 次/分钟)或假设备(无降低呼吸频率目标的音乐)。
在医生办公室测量收缩压和舒张压。
48 名患者被随机分配;干预组 21 名患者(88%)和对照组 24 名患者(100%)完成了研究。收缩压和舒张压均无显著变化,对照组收缩压差异为 2.35mmHg(95%CI,-6.50 至 11.20),干预组舒张压差异为 2.25mmHg(95%CI,-2.16 至 6.67)。干预组有 3 名患者出现不良事件。
这项高质量方法学研究表明,设备指导的呼吸频率降低对 2 型糖尿病患者的诊室血压无显著影响。基于这项研究以及除一项试验外的所有试验结果,设备指导的呼吸频率降低似乎不是治疗高血压的可行非药物选择。