McMaster Integrative Neuroscience Discovery and Study Program, McMaster University Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Front Neural Circuits. 2013 May 28;7:97. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00097. eCollection 2013.
Two theories have influenced our understanding of cortical development: the integrated network theory, where synaptic development is coordinated across areas; and the cascade theory, where the cortex develops in a wave-like manner from sensory to non-sensory areas. These different views on cortical development raise challenges for current studies aimed at comparing detailed maturation of the connectome among cortical areas. We have taken a different approach to compare synaptic development in rat visual, somatosensory, and frontal cortex by measuring expression of pre-synaptic (synapsin and synaptophysin) proteins that regulate vesicle cycling, and post-synaptic density (PSD-95 and Gephyrin) proteins that anchor excitatory or inhibitory (E-I) receptors. We also compared development of the balances between the pairs of pre- or post-synaptic proteins, and the overall pre- to post-synaptic balance, to address functional maturation and emergence of the E-I balance. We found that development of the individual proteins and the post-synaptic index overlapped among the three cortical areas, but the pre-synaptic index matured later in frontal cortex. Finally, we applied a neuroinformatics approach using principal component analysis and found that three components captured development of the synaptic proteins. The first component accounted for 64% of the variance in protein expression and reflected total protein expression, which overlapped among the three cortical areas. The second component was gephyrin and the E-I balance, it emerged as sequential waves starting in somatosensory, then frontal, and finally visual cortex. The third component was the balance between pre- and post-synaptic proteins, and this followed a different developmental trajectory in somatosensory cortex. Together, these results give the most support to an integrated network of synaptic development, but also highlight more complex patterns of development that vary in timing and end point among the cortical areas.
整合网络理论,其中突触发育在各个区域之间协调;级联理论,其中皮质以波浪状的方式从感觉区域向非感觉区域发育。这些关于皮质发育的不同观点为当前旨在比较皮质区域间连接组详细成熟度的研究带来了挑战。我们采用了一种不同的方法来比较大鼠视觉、体感和前额皮质中的突触发育,方法是测量调节囊泡循环的突触前(突触素和突触小体蛋白)和后(PSD-95 和 Gephyrin)蛋白的表达,这些蛋白锚定兴奋性或抑制性(E-I)受体。我们还比较了前后突触蛋白对的平衡以及总体前到后突触平衡的发育,以解决功能成熟和 E-I 平衡的出现。我们发现,三种皮质区域之间的单个蛋白和后突触指数的发育重叠,但前额皮质中的前突触指数成熟较晚。最后,我们应用了一种神经信息学方法,使用主成分分析,发现三个成分可以捕捉突触蛋白的发育。第一个成分占蛋白表达变化的 64%,反映了三个皮质区域之间的总蛋白表达。第二个成分是 Gephyrin 和 E-I 平衡,它以从体感皮层开始的顺序波出现,然后是前额皮层,最后是视觉皮层。第三个成分是前突触和后突触蛋白之间的平衡,它在体感皮层中遵循不同的发育轨迹。总的来说,这些结果最支持突触发育的整合网络,但也突出了在时间和终点方面在皮质区域之间存在更多复杂的发育模式。