Department of Fitossanidade, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Jaboticabal Campus, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 6;8(6):e65759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065759. Print 2013.
The objective of this study was to evaluate different strategies for the application of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN). Three different models of spray nozzles with air induction (AI 11003, TTI 11003 and AD-IA 11004), three spray pressures (207, 413 and 720 kPa), four different additives for tank mixtures (cane molasses, mineral oil, vegetable oil and glycerin) and the influence of tank mixture stirring time were all evaluated for their effect on EPN (Steinernema feltiae) viability and pathogenicity. The different nozzles, at pressures of up to 620 kPa, were found to be compatible with S. feltiae. Vegetable oil, mineral oil and molasses were found to be compatible adjuvants for S. feltiae, and stirring in a motorized backpack sprayer for 30 minutes did not impact the viability or pathogenicity of this nematode. Appropriate techniques for the application of nematodes with backpack sprayers are discussed.
本研究旨在评估应用昆虫病原线虫(EPN)的不同策略。使用三种具有空气诱导功能的喷雾喷嘴(AI 11003、TTI 11003 和 AD-IA 11004)、三种喷雾压力(207、413 和 720 kPa)、四种不同的罐混添加剂(甘蔗糖蜜、矿物油、植物油和甘油)以及罐混搅拌时间的影响,对 EPN(斯氏线虫)的存活和致病性进行了评估。结果发现,在高达 620 kPa 的压力下,不同的喷嘴与 S. feltiae 兼容。植物油、矿物油和糖蜜被发现是 S. feltiae 的兼容佐剂,在背负式机动喷雾器中搅拌 30 分钟不会影响这种线虫的生存能力或致病性。讨论了使用背负式喷雾器应用线虫的适当技术。