Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):788-92. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet202. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
Ultrasound (US)-guided subclavian vein (SCV) catheterization via the supraclavicular (SC) or infraclavicular (IC) approaches can be useful in children. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of these approaches.
This prospective, randomized study included 98 children who were <3 years old, and who were divided into two groups: the SC group (n=49) and the IC group (n=49). All SCV catheterizations were guided by US and performed by a single experienced anaesthesiologist. Data regarding puncture time, number of attempts, successful guidewire insertion, catheter insertion time, and complications were analysed.
The median puncture time was longer in the IC group than the SC group (48 vs 36 s, P=0.02). Multiple attempts (number of attempts >3) were more frequently required in the IC group than the SC group (24.5 vs 6.1%, P=0.01). The incidence of guidewire misplacement was higher in the IC group than that of the SC group [10 (20.4%) vs 0 (0%), P=0.001]. Catheterization was successfully performed in all patients. No pneumothoraces or arterial punctures occurred in either group.
During SCV catheterization under US guidance in paediatric patients, the SC approach yielded a shorter puncture time and decreased the incidence of guidewire misplacement when compared with the IC approach.
超声(US)引导下锁骨下静脉(SCV)经锁骨上(SC)或锁骨下(IC)途径置管在儿童中可能很有用。本研究的目的是比较这两种方法的效果。
这是一项前瞻性、随机研究,纳入了 98 名年龄<3 岁的儿童,将其分为两组:SC 组(n=49)和 IC 组(n=49)。所有 SCV 置管均由超声引导,并由一位经验丰富的麻醉医师进行。分析了穿刺时间、尝试次数、导丝插入成功、导管插入时间和并发症等数据。
IC 组的中位穿刺时间长于 SC 组(48 比 36 s,P=0.02)。IC 组比 SC 组更频繁地需要多次尝试(尝试次数>3)(24.5%比 6.1%,P=0.01)。IC 组导丝错位的发生率高于 SC 组[10(20.4%)比 0(0%),P=0.001]。所有患者均成功进行了置管。两组均未发生气胸或动脉穿刺。
在超声引导下进行 SCV 置管时,与 IC 途径相比,SC 途径的穿刺时间更短,导丝错位的发生率更低。