Suppr超能文献

超声引导锁骨上和锁骨下入路在儿童锁骨下静脉置管中的比较——一项随机试验。

Comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches for subclavian venous catheterization in children--a randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):788-92. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet202. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US)-guided subclavian vein (SCV) catheterization via the supraclavicular (SC) or infraclavicular (IC) approaches can be useful in children. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of these approaches.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized study included 98 children who were <3 years old, and who were divided into two groups: the SC group (n=49) and the IC group (n=49). All SCV catheterizations were guided by US and performed by a single experienced anaesthesiologist. Data regarding puncture time, number of attempts, successful guidewire insertion, catheter insertion time, and complications were analysed.

RESULTS

The median puncture time was longer in the IC group than the SC group (48 vs 36 s, P=0.02). Multiple attempts (number of attempts >3) were more frequently required in the IC group than the SC group (24.5 vs 6.1%, P=0.01). The incidence of guidewire misplacement was higher in the IC group than that of the SC group [10 (20.4%) vs 0 (0%), P=0.001]. Catheterization was successfully performed in all patients. No pneumothoraces or arterial punctures occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

During SCV catheterization under US guidance in paediatric patients, the SC approach yielded a shorter puncture time and decreased the incidence of guidewire misplacement when compared with the IC approach.

摘要

背景

超声(US)引导下锁骨下静脉(SCV)经锁骨上(SC)或锁骨下(IC)途径置管在儿童中可能很有用。本研究的目的是比较这两种方法的效果。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机研究,纳入了 98 名年龄<3 岁的儿童,将其分为两组:SC 组(n=49)和 IC 组(n=49)。所有 SCV 置管均由超声引导,并由一位经验丰富的麻醉医师进行。分析了穿刺时间、尝试次数、导丝插入成功、导管插入时间和并发症等数据。

结果

IC 组的中位穿刺时间长于 SC 组(48 比 36 s,P=0.02)。IC 组比 SC 组更频繁地需要多次尝试(尝试次数>3)(24.5%比 6.1%,P=0.01)。IC 组导丝错位的发生率高于 SC 组[10(20.4%)比 0(0%),P=0.001]。所有患者均成功进行了置管。两组均未发生气胸或动脉穿刺。

结论

在超声引导下进行 SCV 置管时,与 IC 途径相比,SC 途径的穿刺时间更短,导丝错位的发生率更低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验