Suppr超能文献

儿童阑尾炎诊断中错失机会的影响。

The implications of missed opportunities to diagnose appendicitis in children.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;20(6):592-6. doi: 10.1111/acem.12144.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the fraction of children with acute appendicitis who had recent false-negative diagnoses and to analyze the association of a missed diagnosis of appendicitis with patient outcome.

METHODS

The records of all 816 patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis at a free-standing children's hospital between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed. A patient admitted or evaluated in the emergency department (ED), discharged without a diagnosis of appendicitis, and then readmitted with histopathologically confirmed appendicitis within 3 days was considered to have a "missed diagnosis." Outcomes for this missed group were compared to those of the remainder of the appendectomy cohort.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with appendicitis (4.8%) were missed at initial presentation. The most common initial discharge diagnoses were acute gastroenteritis (43.6%), constipation (10.3%), and emesis (10.3%). The median duration from the initial evaluation to the appendicitis admission was 28.3 hours (interquartile range [IQR] = 17.0 to 39.6 hours). A missed diagnosis was associated with a longer median hospitalization (5.8 days [IQR = 4.0 to 8.1 days] vs. 2.5 days [IQR = 1.8 to 4.6 days]; p < 0.001), higher rate of perforation (74.4% vs. 29.0%; p < 0.001), higher complication rate (28.2% vs. 10.4%; p = 0.002), and higher rate of reintervention (20.5% vs. 6.2%; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Of children diagnosed with appendicitis, 4.8% may have had a missed opportunity for earlier diagnosis. These false-negative diagnoses are associated with higher rates of perforation, postoperative complications, and need for postoperative interventions, as well as longer hospitalizations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定急性阑尾炎患儿中近期出现假阴性诊断的比例,并分析阑尾炎漏诊与患者预后的关系。

方法

回顾了 2007 年至 2010 年间,一家独立儿童医院对 816 例疑似阑尾炎患者进行阑尾切除术的所有记录。在急诊科(ED)就诊或评估的患者,如果未被诊断为阑尾炎,出院后 3 天内通过组织病理学确诊为阑尾炎,则被认为是“漏诊”。将漏诊组的结果与阑尾切除术队列的其余部分进行比较。

结果

39 例(4.8%)阑尾炎患者在初次就诊时被漏诊。最常见的初始出院诊断为急性胃肠炎(43.6%)、便秘(10.3%)和呕吐(10.3%)。从初次评估到阑尾炎入院的中位时间为 28.3 小时(四分位距[IQR] = 17.0 至 39.6 小时)。漏诊与中位住院时间较长相关(5.8 天[IQR = 4.0 至 8.1 天] vs. 2.5 天[IQR = 1.8 至 4.6 天];p < 0.001)、穿孔率较高(74.4% vs. 29.0%;p < 0.001)、并发症发生率较高(28.2% vs. 10.4%;p = 0.002)和再次干预率较高(20.5% vs. 6.2%;p = 0.003)。

结论

在诊断为阑尾炎的儿童中,4.8%可能错过了早期诊断的机会。这些假阴性诊断与更高的穿孔率、术后并发症发生率和需要术后干预以及更长的住院时间有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验