Tiwari Sapana, Kumar Ashu, Thavaselvam Duraipandian, Mangalgi Smita, Rathod Vedika, Prakash Archana, Barua Anita, Arora Sonia, Sathyaseelan Kannusamy
Division of Microbiology, Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior, India.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013 Aug;20(8):1217-22. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00111-13. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
Brucellosis is an important zoonotic infectious disease of humans and livestock with worldwide distribution and is caused by bacteria of the genus Brucella. The diagnosis of brucellosis always requires laboratory confirmation by either isolation of pathogens or detection of specific antibodies. The conventional serological tests available for the diagnosis of brucellosis are less specific and show cross-reactivity with other closely related organisms. These tests also necessitate the handling of Brucella species for antigen preparation. Therefore, there is a need to develop reliable, rapid, and user-friendly systems for disease diagnosis and alternatives to vaccine approaches. Keeping in mind the importance of brucellosis as an emerging infection and the prevalence in India, we carried out the present study to compare the recombinant antigens with the native antigens (cell envelope and sonicated antigen) of Brucella for diagnosis of human brucellosis by an indirect plate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Recombinant outer membrane protein 28 (rOmp28) and rOmp31 antigens were cloned, expressed, and purified in the bacterial expression system, and the purified proteins were used as antigens. Indirect plate ELISAs were then performed and standardized for comparison of the reactivities of recombinant and native antigens against the 433 clinical samples submitted for brucellosis testing, 15 culture-positive samples, and 20 healthy donor samples. The samples were separated into four groups based on their positivity to rose bengal plate agglutination tests (RBPTs), standard tube agglutination tests (STATs), and 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME) tests. The sensitivities and specificities of all the antigens were calculated, and the rOmp28 antigen was found to be more suitable for the clinical diagnosis of brucellosis than the rOmp31 antigen and native antigens. The rOmp28-based ELISA showed a very high degree of agreement with the conventional agglutination tests and promising results for further use in clinical screening and serodiagnosis of human brucellosis.
布鲁氏菌病是一种重要的人畜共患传染病,在全球范围内广泛分布,由布鲁氏菌属细菌引起。布鲁氏菌病的诊断始终需要通过病原体分离或特异性抗体检测进行实验室确认。现有的用于诊断布鲁氏菌病的传统血清学检测特异性较低,且与其他密切相关的生物体存在交叉反应。这些检测还需要处理布鲁氏菌属物种以制备抗原。因此,需要开发可靠、快速且用户友好的疾病诊断系统以及疫苗方法的替代方案。考虑到布鲁氏菌病作为一种新发感染的重要性以及在印度的流行情况,我们开展了本研究,通过间接平板酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)比较重组抗原与布鲁氏菌的天然抗原(细胞包膜和超声破碎抗原)用于诊断人类布鲁氏菌病的效果。重组外膜蛋白28(rOmp28)和rOmp31抗原在细菌表达系统中进行克隆、表达和纯化,并将纯化后的蛋白用作抗原。然后进行间接平板ELISA并标准化,以比较重组抗原和天然抗原对提交进行布鲁氏菌病检测的433份临床样本、15份培养阳性样本和20份健康供体样本的反应性。根据样本对玫瑰红平板凝集试验(RBPT)、标准试管凝集试验(STAT)和2-巯基乙醇(2ME)试验的阳性反应将样本分为四组。计算所有抗原的敏感性和特异性,发现rOmp28抗原比rOmp31抗原和天然抗原更适合用于布鲁氏菌病的临床诊断。基于rOmp28的ELISA与传统凝集试验显示出高度一致性,在人类布鲁氏菌病的临床筛查和血清学诊断中进一步应用具有良好前景。