Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Research and Development Centre, Blackberry Hill Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 10;8(6):e65712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065712. Print 2013.
Compared to cognitively healthy ageing (CH), intra-individual variability in reaction time (IIV(RT)), a behavioural marker of neurological integrity, is commonly reported to increase in both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). It varies in MCI with respect to whether it represents the pro-dromal stages of dementia or not; being greatest in those most likely to convert. Abnormal IIV(RT) in MCI therefore represents a potential measure of underlying functional integrity that may serve to differentiate MCI from CH and to help identify those patients for whom MCI is the result of a progressive pathological process. As the clinical approach to MCI is increasingly stratified with respect to gender, we investigated whether this factor could influence study outcome. The influence of RTSPEED and processing load upon IIV(RT) was also examined. Under low processing load conditions, IIV(RT) was significantly increased in both MCI and AD compared to CH. However, correcting for an individual's processing speed abolished this effect in MCI but not in AD, indicating that the increased IIV(RT) in MCI and AD may result from different factors. In MCI but not in CH, IIV(RT) was significantly greater for females. Increasing task processing load by adding distracting information, although increasing overall IIV(RT), failed to improve the differentiation between CH and both MCI and AD, and in MCI resulted in a reduction in the influence of gender upon study outcome. The outcome of studies investigating IIV(RT) in MCI and AD compared to CH therefore appear influenced by the gender of the participants, by task-related processing load and processing speed.
与认知健康老化 (CH) 相比,反应时 (RT) 的个体内变异性,即神经完整性的行为标志物,在阿尔茨海默病 (AD) 和轻度认知障碍 (MCI) 中均普遍增加。MCI 中,根据其是否代表痴呆的前驱阶段而有所不同;在最有可能转化的患者中最为明显。因此,MCI 中的异常 IIV(RT) 代表了潜在的功能完整性的衡量标准,它可能有助于区分 MCI 与 CH,并有助于识别那些 MCI 是进行性病理过程结果的患者。由于 MCI 的临床方法越来越根据性别进行分层,我们研究了这一因素是否会影响研究结果。还研究了 RTSPEED 和处理负载对 IIV(RT) 的影响。在低处理负载条件下,与 CH 相比,MCI 和 AD 中的 IIV(RT) 均显著增加。然而,在 MCI 中,通过个体的处理速度进行校正消除了这种影响,但在 AD 中则没有,这表明 MCI 和 AD 中增加的 IIV(RT)可能是由不同的因素导致的。在 MCI 中,但不是在 CH 中,女性的 IIV(RT)明显更大。通过添加分散注意力的信息来增加任务处理负载,尽管增加了整体 IIV(RT),但无法改善 CH 与 MCI 和 AD 之间的区分,并且在 MCI 中,性别对研究结果的影响降低。因此,与 CH 相比,MCI 和 AD 中 IIV(RT)的研究结果似乎受到参与者的性别、与任务相关的处理负载和处理速度的影响。