• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CompCog 的诊断准确性:反应时作为轻度认知障碍的筛查指标。

Diagnostic accuracy of CompCog: reaction time as a screening measure for mild cognitive impairment.

机构信息

Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Psicologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.

Università degli Studi di Perugia, Dipartimento di Filosofia, scienze sociali, umane e della formazione, Perugia, Italia.

出版信息

Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022 Jun;80(6):570-579. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2021-0099.

DOI:10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2021-0099
PMID:35946705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9387195/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reaction time is affected under different neurological conditions but has not been much investigated considering all types of mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of CompCog, a computerized cognitive screening battery focusing on reaction time measurements.

METHODS

A sample of 52 older adults underwent neuropsychological assessments, including CompCog, and medical appointments, to be classified as a control group or be diagnosed with MCI. The accuracy of CompCog for distinguishing between the two groups was calculated.

RESULTS

The results from diagnostic accuracy analyses showed that the AUCs of ROC curves were as high as 0.915 (CI 0.837-0.993). The subtest with the highest sensitivity and specificity (choice reaction time subtest) had 91.7% sensitivity and 89.3% specificity. The logistic regression final model correctly classified 92.3% of individuals, with 92.9% specificity and 91.7% sensitivity, and included only four variables from different subtests.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the study showed that reaction time assessed through CompCog is a good screening measure to differentiate between normal aging and MCI. Reaction time measurements in milliseconds were more accurate than correct answers. This test can form part of routine clinical tests to achieve the objectives of screening for MCI, indicating further procedures for investigation and diagnosis and planning interventions.

摘要

背景

反应时间会受到不同神经状态的影响,但考虑到所有类型的轻度认知障碍(MCI),其并未得到太多研究。

目的

本研究调查了 CompCog 的诊断准确性,CompCog 是一种专注于反应时间测量的计算机化认知筛查工具。

方法

一组 52 名老年人接受了神经心理学评估,包括 CompCog 和医疗预约,以被分类为对照组或被诊断为 MCI。计算 CompCog 区分两组的准确性。

结果

诊断准确性分析的结果显示,ROC 曲线的 AUC 高达 0.915(CI 0.837-0.993)。灵敏度和特异性最高的亚测试(选择反应时亚测试)的灵敏度为 91.7%,特异性为 89.3%。逻辑回归最终模型正确分类了 92.3%的个体,特异性为 92.9%,灵敏度为 91.7%,仅包含来自不同亚测试的四个变量。

结论

综上所述,该研究表明,通过 CompCog 评估的反应时间是区分正常衰老和 MCI 的良好筛查措施。以毫秒为单位的反应时间测量比正确答案更准确。该测试可以作为常规临床测试的一部分,以实现 MCI 的筛查目标,指示进一步的调查和诊断程序以及干预计划。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of CompCog: reaction time as a screening measure for mild cognitive impairment.CompCog 的诊断准确性:反应时作为轻度认知障碍的筛查指标。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022 Jun;80(6):570-579. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2021-0099.
2
Accuracy of a Brief Neuropsychological Battery for the Diagnosis of Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Analysis of the NEDICES Cohort.用于诊断痴呆和轻度认知障碍的简短神经心理测验组合的准确性:NEDICES队列分析
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;48(1):163-73. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150086.
3
Diagnostic test accuracy of telehealth assessment for dementia and mild cognitive impairment.远程医疗评估对痴呆和轻度认知障碍的诊断测试准确性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013786.pub2.
4
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment After Omission of Hearing-Dependent Subtests: Psychometrics and Clinical Recommendations.省略听力依赖测试后的蒙特利尔认知评估:心理计量学和临床建议。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Aug;67(8):1689-1694. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15940. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
5
Diagnostic value of digital clock drawing test in comparison with CERAD neuropsychological battery total score for discrimination of patients in the early course of Alzheimer's disease from healthy individuals.数字时钟绘画测试与 CERAD 神经心理学成套测验总分在鉴别阿尔茨海默病早期患者与健康个体中的诊断价值比较。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 5;9(1):3543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40010-0.
6
Is the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen (QMCI) more accurate at detecting mild cognitive impairment than existing short cognitive screening tests? A systematic review of the current literature.快速轻度认知障碍筛查(QMCI)比现有的简短认知筛查测试更能准确检测轻度认知障碍吗?对当前文献的系统回顾。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;34(12):1739-1746. doi: 10.1002/gps.5201. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
7
Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: Improving the Diagnostic Utility of the MoCA through Subtest Weighting.帕金森病认知障碍的筛查:通过子测验加权提高蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)的诊断效用
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 20;11(7):e0159318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159318. eCollection 2016.
8
Feasibility and Validity of Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery in Mild Cognitive Impairment Screening for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.在心房颤动患者轻度认知障碍筛查中,剑桥神经心理学测试自动电池的可行性和有效性。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Feb 8;2022:1527292. doi: 10.1155/2022/1527292. eCollection 2022.
9
A comparative study on the validations of three cognitive screening tests in identifying subtle cognitive decline.三种认知筛查测试在识别轻度认知衰退方面的验证比较研究。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Mar 5;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01657-9.
10
The Screening Utility and Ecological Validity of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Bill Payment Subtest in Older Adults with and without Dementia.认知评估电池账单支付测验在老年痴呆症患者和非痴呆症患者中的筛查效用和生态效度。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Oct 24;34(7):1156-1164. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acz033.

引用本文的文献

1
Limited Evidence to Review-Is There an Association Between Cognition and Upper Extremity Motor Reaction Time in Older Adults?有限的证据回顾——老年人的认知与上肢运动反应时间之间存在关联吗?
NeuroSci. 2025 Jul 30;6(3):71. doi: 10.3390/neurosci6030071.
2
Reliability of remote self-administered digital cognitive assessments: preliminary validation study.远程自我管理数字认知评估的可靠性:初步验证研究
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jul 3;7:1571053. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1571053. eCollection 2025.
3
Smartphone- and Tablet-Based Tools to Assess Cognition in Individuals With Preclinical Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Scoping Review.基于智能手机和平板电脑的工具用于评估临床前阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍个体的认知:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 27;27:e65297. doi: 10.2196/65297.
4
Establishing Reference Values for a New Computerized Cognitive Function Test Program for Children.为儿童新的计算机化认知功能测试程序建立参考值。
Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Apr;48(2):135-145. doi: 10.5535/arm.230014. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
5
A Perspective: Challenges in Dementia Research.一个观点:痴呆症研究中的挑战。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 28;58(10):1368. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101368.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence of the validity of a novel version of the computerized cognitive screening battery CompCog.新型计算机化认知筛查组合测试CompCog有效性的证据。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2021 Oct-Dec;15(4):485-496. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642021dn15-040010.
2
Mild cognitive impairment history and current procedures in low- and middle-income countries: a brief review.低收入和中等收入国家的轻度认知障碍病史及当前诊疗程序:简要综述
Dement Neuropsychol. 2021 Apr-Jun;15(2):155-163. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642021dn15-020001.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of early cognitive indicators in mild cognitive impairment.轻度认知障碍中早期认知指标的诊断准确性
Dement Neuropsychol. 2020 Dec;14(4):358-365. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642020dn14-040005.
4
A Meta-Analysis of Semantic Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment.轻度认知障碍的语义记忆的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2021 Jun;31(2):221-232. doi: 10.1007/s11065-020-09453-5. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
5
Serial Reaction Time Task Performance in Older Adults with Neuropsychologically Defined Mild Cognitive Impairment.具有神经心理学定义的轻度认知障碍的老年人的序列反应时任务表现
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;74(2):491-500. doi: 10.3233/JAD-191323.
6
Management of mild cognitive impairment (MCI): The need for national and international guidelines.轻度认知障碍(MCI)的管理:需要国家和国际指南。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;21(8):579-594. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2019.1696473. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
7
Potential Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment.用于轻度认知障碍诊断的潜在体液生物标志物。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 25;20(17):4149. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174149.
8
Is Reaction Time Slowing an Early Sign of Alzheimer's Disease? A Meta-Analysis.反应时减慢是否是阿尔茨海默病的早期迹象?一项荟萃分析。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;47(4-6):281-288. doi: 10.1159/000500348. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
9
Reaction time variability and brain white matter integrity.反应时变异性与脑白质完整性。
Neuropsychology. 2019 Jul;33(5):642-657. doi: 10.1037/neu0000483.
10
Validity of screening tools for dementia and mild cognitive impairment among the elderly in primary health care: a systematic review.用于初级卫生保健中老年人群痴呆和轻度认知障碍的筛查工具的有效性:系统评价。
Public Health. 2019 Apr;169:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Mar 1.