Jooste P L, Yach D, Steenkamp H J, Botha J L, Rossouw J E
Research Institute for Nutritional Diseases, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg.
Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Jun;19(2):284-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/19.2.284.
Bias resulting from a loss of baseline subjects at follow-up (drop-out), and newcomer bias resulting from subjects entering the study at the follow-up stage, were investigated in a three-community coronary risk factor follow-up study. The study consisted of a cross-sectional baseline study on 7188 participants aged 15 to 64 years, a four-year intervention period and a follow-up cross-sectional study in the same communities on 6283 participants aged 19 to 68 years. The overall non-response rate of 45% in men and 42% in women varied from 30 to 79% in the various age and sex groups, with the biggest drop-out rate occurring in the youngest age group of 15 to 24 years. At baseline drop-outs were more likely to have lower educational qualifications than those who participated in both the baseline and follow-up studies (stayers) and included significantly more smokers than non-smokers. Coronary risk factors of newcomers were not different from that of the stayers at follow-up except for slightly, but not significantly, higher smoking rates in newcomers. These findings suggest that drop-out and newcomer bias need to be assessed and its effect studied before final evaluation of data in community follow-up studies.
在一项三社区冠心病危险因素随访研究中,对随访时基线受试者失访(退出)导致的偏倚以及随访阶段进入研究的受试者所导致的新入者偏倚进行了调查。该研究包括对7188名15至64岁参与者的横断面基线研究、为期四年的干预期以及在同一社区对6283名19至68岁参与者进行的随访横断面研究。男性45%、女性42%的总体无应答率在不同年龄和性别组中从30%到79%不等,最大退出率出现在15至24岁的最年轻年龄组。在基线时,退出者比同时参与基线和随访研究的人(留存者)更有可能教育程度较低,且吸烟者显著多于非吸烟者。随访时,新入者的冠心病危险因素与留存者无异,只是新入者的吸烟率略高,但不显著。这些发现表明,在社区随访研究的最终数据评估之前,需要评估退出和新入者偏倚并研究其影响。