Malvankar Monali M, Zaric Gregory S
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, 268 Grosvenor St, London, Ontario, N6A4V2.
INFOR. 2011 Nov 1;49(4):241-246. doi: 10.3138/infor.49.4.241.
HIV/AIDS prevention funds are often allocated at multiple levels of decision-making. Optimal allocation of HIV prevention funds maximizes the number of HIV infections averted. However, decision makers often allocate using simple heuristics such as proportional allocation. We evaluate the impact of using incentives to encourage optimal allocation in a two-level decision-making process. We model an incentive based decision-making process consisting of an upper-level decision maker allocating funds to a single lower-level decision maker who then distributes funds to local programs. We assume that the lower-level utility function is linear in the amount of the budget received from the upper-level, the fraction of funds reserved for proportional allocation, and the number of infections averted. We assume that the upper level objective is to maximize the number of infections averted. We illustrate with an example using data from California, U.S.
艾滋病毒/艾滋病预防资金通常在多个决策层面进行分配。艾滋病毒预防资金的最优分配能使避免的艾滋病毒感染数量最大化。然而,决策者往往采用简单的启发式方法进行分配,如按比例分配。我们评估了在两级决策过程中使用激励措施来鼓励最优分配的影响。我们构建了一个基于激励的决策过程模型,其中包括一个上级决策者将资金分配给单个下级决策者,然后下级决策者再将资金分配给当地项目。我们假设下级的效用函数在从上级收到的预算金额、预留用于按比例分配的资金比例以及避免的感染数量方面是线性的。我们假设上级的目标是使避免的感染数量最大化。我们用美国加利福尼亚州的数据举了一个例子进行说明。