• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对艾滋病预防项目组合的最优投资。

Optimal investment in a portfolio of HIV prevention programs.

作者信息

Zaric G S, Brandeau M L

机构信息

Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2001 Sep-Oct;21(5):391-408. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100506.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X0102100506
PMID:11575489
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In this article, the authors determine the optimal allocation of HIV prevention funds and investigate the impact of different allocation methods on health outcomes.

METHODS

The authors present a resource allocation model that can be used to determine the allocation of HIV prevention funds that maximizes quality-adjusted life years (or life years) gained or HIV infections averted in a population over a specified time horizon. They apply the model to determine the allocation of a limited budget among 3 types of HIV prevention programs in a population of injection drug users and nonusers: needle exchange programs, methadone maintenance treatment, and condom availability programs. For each prevention program, the authors estimate a production function that relates the amount invested to the associated change in risky behavior.

RESULTS

The authors determine the optimal allocation of funds for both objective functions for a high-prevalence population and a low-prevalence population. They also consider the allocation of funds under several common rules of thumb that are used to allocate HIV prevention resources. It is shown that simpler allocation methods (e.g., allocation based on HIV incidence or notions of equity among population groups) may lead to alloctions that do not yield the maximum health benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal allocation of HIV prevention funds in a population depends on HIV prevalence and incidence, the objective function, the production functions for the prevention programs, and other factors. Consideration of cost, equity, and social and political norms may be important when allocating HIV prevention funds. The model presented in this article can help decision makers determine the health consequences of different allocations of funds.

摘要

目标

在本文中,作者确定了艾滋病病毒预防资金的最优分配方式,并研究了不同分配方法对健康结果的影响。

方法

作者提出了一种资源分配模型,该模型可用于确定艾滋病病毒预防资金的分配,以在特定时间范围内使人群中获得的质量调整生命年(或生命年)最大化,或避免的艾滋病病毒感染最大化。他们应用该模型来确定在注射吸毒者和非注射吸毒者人群中,在三种艾滋病病毒预防项目之间分配有限预算:针头交换项目、美沙酮维持治疗和避孕套供应项目。对于每个预防项目,作者估计了一个生产函数,该函数将投入的资金量与危险行为的相关变化联系起来。

结果

作者确定了高流行率人群和低流行率人群在两个目标函数下的最优资金分配。他们还考虑了在用于分配艾滋病病毒预防资源的几种常见经验法则下的资金分配。结果表明,更简单的分配方法(例如,基于艾滋病病毒发病率或人群组间公平概念的分配)可能导致无法产生最大健康效益的分配。

结论

人群中艾滋病病毒预防资金的最优分配取决于艾滋病病毒的流行率和发病率、目标函数、预防项目的生产函数以及其他因素。在分配艾滋病病毒预防资金时,考虑成本、公平性以及社会和政治规范可能很重要。本文提出的模型可以帮助决策者确定不同资金分配的健康后果。

相似文献

1
Optimal investment in a portfolio of HIV prevention programs.对艾滋病预防项目组合的最优投资。
Med Decis Making. 2001 Sep-Oct;21(5):391-408. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100506.
2
An analysis of optimal resource allocation for prevention of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in injection drug users and non-users.注射吸毒者和非注射吸毒者预防感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的最佳资源分配分析。
Med Decis Making. 1999 Apr-Jun;19(2):167-79. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900207.
3
Preventing HIV in injection drug users: choosing the best mix of interventions for the population.预防注射吸毒者感染艾滋病毒:为该人群选择最佳干预措施组合。
J Urban Health. 2003 Sep;80(3):465-81. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jtg046.
4
A little planning goes a long way: multilevel allocation of HIV prevention resources.一点规划大有裨益:艾滋病毒预防资源的多层次分配
Med Decis Making. 2007 Jan-Feb;27(1):71-81. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06297395.
5
Employing resource allocation modeling to inform HIV prevention planning for the state of Iowa.运用资源分配模型为爱荷华州的艾滋病预防规划提供信息。
AIDS Educ Prev. 2013 Oct;25(5):423-9. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2013.25.5.423.
6
A linear programming model for allocating HIV prevention funds with state agencies: a pilot study.一个用于与州机构分配艾滋病预防资金的线性规划模型:一项试点研究。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2007 Sep;10(3):239-52. doi: 10.1007/s10729-007-9017-8.
7
A model for allocating CDC's HIV prevention resources in the United States.为美国疾病预防控制中心的艾滋病毒预防资源分配建立模型。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2011 Mar;14(1):115-24. doi: 10.1007/s10729-010-9147-2. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
8
Portfolio evaluation of health programs: a reply to Sendi et al.卫生项目的组合评估:对森迪等人的回应
Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(10):1849-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.01.002.
9
Allocating HIV prevention resources: a tool for state and local decision making.分配艾滋病病毒预防资源:州和地方决策工具
Health Policy. 2008 Sep;87(3):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
10
Portfolio theory and cost-effectiveness analysis: a further discussion.投资组合理论与成本效益分析:进一步探讨
Value Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;7(5):595-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75010.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying optimal resource allocation strategies for controlling epidemics.量化控制传染病的最优资源分配策略。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 May;20(202):20230036. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0036. Epub 2023 May 17.
2
Optimal resource allocation in HIV self-testing secondary distribution among Chinese MSM: data-driven integer programming models.中国男男性行为者人群中 HIV 自我检测二次分发的最优资源配置:基于数据驱动的整数规划模型。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 Jan 10;380(2214):20210128. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0128. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
Public Health Interventions with Harms and Benefits: A Graphical Framework for Evaluating Tradeoffs.
公共卫生干预措施的利弊:权衡取舍的图形框架。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Nov;40(8):978-989. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20960458. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
Resource Allocation for Epidemic Control Across Multiple Sub-populations.多亚人群的传染病控制资源分配。
Bull Math Biol. 2019 Jun;81(6):1731-1759. doi: 10.1007/s11538-019-00584-2. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
5
A systematic review of modelling approaches in economic evaluations of health interventions for drug and alcohol problems.对药物和酒精问题健康干预措施经济评估中建模方法的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 13;16:127. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1368-8.
6
Toward cost-effective staffing mixes for Veterans Affairs substance use disorder treatment programs.寻求退伍军人事务部物质使用障碍治疗项目具有成本效益的人员配置组合。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 23;15:515. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1175-7.
7
Creating impact with operations research in health: making room for practice in academia.通过卫生领域的运筹学创造影响力:在学术界为实践留出空间。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Dec;19(4):305-312. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9328-0. Epub 2015 May 24.
8
AIDS and drug rationing.艾滋病与药物配给。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2010 Mar 16;3:1. Print 2010.
9
HIV epidemic control-a model for optimal allocation of prevention and treatment resources.艾滋病毒疫情控制-最佳分配预防和治疗资源的模式。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2014 Jun;17(2):162-81. doi: 10.1007/s10729-013-9240-4. Epub 2013 Jun 23.
10
Incentives for Optimal Multi-level Allocation of HIV Prevention Resources.优化艾滋病预防资源多层次分配的激励措施。
INFOR. 2011 Nov 1;49(4):241-246. doi: 10.3138/infor.49.4.241.