• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依达拉奉-胞磷胆碱治疗急性缺血性卒中的对比研究(ECCS-AIS)

Edaravone - citicoline comparative study in acute ischemic stroke (ECCS-AIS).

作者信息

Mitta Manish, Goel Deepak, Bansal Krishan K, Puri Prashant

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, HIHT University, Swami Ram Nagar, Doiwala, Dehradun.

出版信息

J Assoc Physicians India. 2012 Nov;60:36-8.

PMID:23767201
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two new neuro-protective agents, Edaravone and Citicoline were recently found to be beneficial in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). But there is no study to compare these two agents on same protocol in AIS. This study was aimed to compare these two neuroprotective agents in AIS.

METHODS

All patients of age more than 18 years who presented within 24 hours of acute ischemic stroke were randomly treated with Edaravone (group E), Citicoline (group C) or none (group N) with other standard treatment of AIS. Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) were recorded on admission and at 3 months. Analysis was done using Anova t test to find out significant difference in outcome at 3 months. P value of < or = 0.05 was labeled as significant.

RESULTS

Mean MRS and NIHSS scores at 3 months were lowest in group E (p = 0.000), suggestive of better outcome in this group. After application of severity scale, 15 patients (68.1%) in group-E, 14 (58.3%) in group C and 18 (72%) in group N had moderate to severe stroke (NIHSS of more than 10). When the patients of moderate to severe stroke were analyzed separately at 3 months, patients in group E (mean 4.46 +/- 3.52) had significantly (p = 0.00) better outcome in comparison to group C (mean 10.28 +/- 7.93) and group N (mean 9.38 +/- 6.44).

CONCLUSIONS

Edaravone was found to be associated with better neurological outcome at 3 months. Citicoline's role as a neuroprotective agent however remains controversial in acute ischaemic stroke.

摘要

背景

最近发现两种新型神经保护剂依达拉奉和胞磷胆碱对急性缺血性卒中(AIS)有益。但尚无研究在相同方案下比较这两种药物在AIS中的疗效。本研究旨在比较这两种神经保护剂在AIS中的疗效。

方法

所有年龄超过18岁、在急性缺血性卒中发病24小时内就诊的患者,在接受AIS其他标准治疗的同时,随机接受依达拉奉治疗(E组)、胞磷胆碱治疗(C组)或不接受治疗(N组)。在入院时和3个月时记录改良Rankin量表(MRS)和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)。采用方差分析t检验进行分析,以找出3个月时结局的显著差异。P值≤0.05被视为具有显著性。

结果

E组3个月时的平均MRS和NIHSS评分最低(p = 0.000),提示该组预后较好。应用严重程度量表后,E组15例患者(68.1%)、C组14例患者(58.3%)和N组18例患者(72%)为中度至重度卒中(NIHSS评分超过10分)。对中度至重度卒中患者在3个月时进行单独分析,与C组(平均10.28±7.93)和N组(平均9.38±6.44)相比,E组患者(平均4.46±3.52)的预后显著更好(p = 0.00)。

结论

发现依达拉奉与3个月时更好的神经学结局相关。然而,胞磷胆碱作为神经保护剂在急性缺血性卒中中的作用仍存在争议。

相似文献

1
Edaravone - citicoline comparative study in acute ischemic stroke (ECCS-AIS).依达拉奉-胞磷胆碱治疗急性缺血性卒中的对比研究(ECCS-AIS)
J Assoc Physicians India. 2012 Nov;60:36-8.
2
Citicoline for acute ischemic stroke in Mexican hospitals: a retrospective postmarketing analysis.墨西哥医院中胞磷胆碱用于急性缺血性卒中的回顾性上市后分析。
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jun;32(5):325-30. doi: 10.1358/mf.2010.32.5.1465004.
3
[Neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke. Practicability of guidelines for treatment].[急性缺血性卒中的神经保护。治疗指南的实用性]
Rev Neurol. 2001;32(9):818-21.
4
Efficacy and safety of oral citicoline in acute ischemic stroke: drug surveillance study in 4,191 cases.口服胞磷胆碱治疗急性缺血性卒中的疗效与安全性:4191例药物监测研究
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Apr;31(3):171-6. doi: 10.1358/mf.2009.31.3.1364241.
5
Edaravone with and without .6 Mg/Kg Alteplase within 4.5 Hours after Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Cohort Study (PROTECT4.5).缺血性卒中后4.5小时内使用与不使用0.6毫克/千克阿替普酶的依达拉奉:一项前瞻性队列研究(PROTECT4.5)
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Apr;26(4):756-765. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
6
Effect of citicoline on ischemic lesions as measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Citicoline 010 Investigators.通过扩散加权磁共振成像测量的胞磷胆碱对缺血性病变的影响。胞磷胆碱010研究人员。
Ann Neurol. 2000 Nov;48(5):713-22.
7
Effect of edaravone on the estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with acute ischemic stroke and chronic kidney disease.依达拉奉对伴有慢性肾脏疾病的急性缺血性脑卒中患者估算肾小球滤过率的影响。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011 Mar-Apr;20(2):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.11.008. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
8
Edaravone: a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of acute stroke.依达拉奉:急性脑卒中治疗的新策略。
Med Hypotheses. 2010 Dec;75(6):583-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.07.038. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
9
[Neuroprotective treatment with citicoline (ceraxon) in patients with ischemic stroke].[用胞磷胆碱(喜复康)对缺血性中风患者进行神经保护治疗]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2012;112(3 Pt 2):21-6.
10
The effects of citicoline on acute ischemic stroke: a review.胞磷胆碱对急性缺血性脑卒中的影响:综述
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Aug;23(7):1764-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.01.020. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of different doses of citicoline in improving the prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke based on network meta-analysis.基于网状Meta分析的不同剂量胞磷胆碱改善急性缺血性脑卒中患者预后的疗效
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 4;16:1529647. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1529647. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative efficacy of neuroprotective agents for improving neurological function and prognosis in acute ischemic stroke: a network meta-analysis.神经保护剂改善急性缺血性卒中神经功能及预后的比较疗效:一项网状Meta分析
Front Neurosci. 2025 Jan 6;18:1530987. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1530987. eCollection 2024.
3
Edaravone's Safety Profile in Acute Ischemic Stroke.
依达拉奉在急性缺血性卒中中的安全性概况。
Brain Behav. 2024 Dec;14(12):e70158. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70158.
4
Efficacy analysis of neuroprotective drugs in patients with acute ischemic stroke based on network meta-analysis.基于网状Meta分析的神经保护药物治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Nov 7;15:1475021. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1475021. eCollection 2024.
5
The role of oxidative stress in blood-brain barrier disruption during ischemic stroke: Antioxidants in clinical trials.氧化应激在缺血性脑卒中期间血脑屏障破坏中的作用:临床试验中的抗氧化剂。
Biochem Pharmacol. 2024 Oct;228:116186. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116186. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
6
Citicoline: pharmacological and clinical review, 2022 update.胞磷胆碱:药理学和临床综述,2022 年更新。
Rev Neurol. 2022 Nov 30;75(s05):S1-S89. doi: 10.33588/rn.75s05.2022311.
7
A Review on Preclinical Models of Ischemic Stroke: Insights Into the Pathomechanisms and New Treatment Strategies.缺血性脑卒中的临床前模型综述:对发病机制和新治疗策略的深入了解。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2022 Aug 3;20(9):1667-1686. doi: 10.2174/1570159X19666210907092928.
8
Application of Citicoline in Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review.胞磷胆碱在神经障碍中的应用:系统评价。
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 12;12(10):3113. doi: 10.3390/nu12103113.
9
Citicoline for treating people with acute ischemic stroke.胞磷胆碱用于治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 29;8(8):CD013066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013066.pub2.
10
Efficacy of Neuroprotective Drugs in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Is It Helpful?神经保护药物在急性缺血性卒中中的疗效:是否有益?
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Oct;10(4):576-581. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700790. Epub 2019 Dec 11.