• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用连续血流心室辅助装置进行心脏移植过渡的患者生存率提高。

Improved survival in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist device for bridge to heart transplantation.

作者信息

Ono M, Nishimura T, Kinoshita O, Shiga T, Kinugawa K, Nagai R, Kyo S

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2013 Jun;45(5):2017-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.01.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.01.005
PMID:23769098
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contemporary continuous-flow ventricular assist devices (CFVADs) have greatly improved patient survival for indications of bridge to transplantation (BTT) and destination therapy. In Japan, CFVAD is limited for BTT use. The waiting period for heart transplantation (HT) is long owing to donor shortage. We examined the results of CFVAD for BTT indication.

METHODS

Eighty-nine VAD treatments were performed among subjects whose preimplantation condition was profile 1 (n = 49) or profile 2 or 3 (n = 40). The device was the paracorporeal pulsatile Nipro VAD (n = 67) or CFVAD (n = 22). All CFVAD patients were profile 2 or 3.

RESULTS

The median assist period was 529 days (Nipro VAD, 530; CFVAD, 528). Twenty-six patients were on the device for >2 years. Actuarial survival was 81.6%, 69.5%, and 61.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years. Survival in profile 1 was significantly worse than in profile 2 or 3. Survival of CFVAD patients was superior to that of paracorporeal VAD. Six-month mortality rate of 20% in cases before 2009 (n = 60) was dramatically improved to 3% among those after 2010 (n = 29). All patients with CFVAD were alive and discharged home. 26 patients were transplanted, 7 had been weaned from VAD and 27 were on a device. The rate of events requiring hospital admission was 0.98 per patient-year in CFVAD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary CFVADs have enabled advanced heart failure patients to await HT safely with an improved quality of life. The advent of CFVAD has also shifted their preimplantation condition to a less sick status. CFVADs were the safest, most reliable circulatory support devices for long-term waiting periods for the BTT indications.

摘要

背景

当代连续流心室辅助装置(CFVAD)已显著提高了用于桥接移植(BTT)和终末期治疗适应症患者的生存率。在日本,CFVAD仅限于用于BTT。由于供体短缺,心脏移植(HT)的等待期很长。我们研究了CFVAD用于BTT适应症的结果。

方法

在植入前状况为1型(n = 49)或2型或3型(n = 40)的受试者中进行了89次VAD治疗。使用的装置为体外搏动性日机装VAD(n = 67)或CFVAD(n = 22)。所有CFVAD患者均为2型或3型。

结果

中位辅助期为529天(日机装VAD为530天;CFVAD为528天)。26例患者使用该装置超过2年。1年、3年和5年的精算生存率分别为81.6%、69.5%和61.1%。1型患者的生存率明显低于2型或3型患者。CFVAD患者的生存率优于体外VAD患者。2009年前病例(n = 60)的6个月死亡率为20%,在2010年后的病例(n = 29)中显著改善至3%。所有CFVAD患者均存活并出院回家。26例患者接受了移植,7例已脱离VAD,27例仍在使用装置。CFVAD患者因事件需住院的发生率为每人每年0.98次。

结论

当代CFVAD使晚期心力衰竭患者能够安全等待HT,生活质量得到改善。CFVAD的出现也使他们植入前的状况转变为病情较轻的状态。对于BTT适应症的长期等待期,CFVAD是最安全、最可靠的循环支持装置。

相似文献

1
Improved survival in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist device for bridge to heart transplantation.使用连续血流心室辅助装置进行心脏移植过渡的患者生存率提高。
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jun;45(5):2017-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.01.005.
2
[Ventricular Assist Device].[心室辅助装置]
Kyobu Geka. 2017 Jan;70(1):16-22.
3
Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.在当前接受连续流左心室辅助装置的患者中,心脏移植后的存活率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.095.
4
Pediatric bridge to heart transplantation: application of the Berlin Heart, Medos and Thoratec ventricular assist devices.小儿心脏移植过渡治疗:柏林心脏、美多斯和索拉泰克心室辅助装置的应用
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Jan;25(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
5
Cost-effectiveness of ventricular assist device therapy as a bridge to transplantation compared with nonbridged cardiac recipients.心室辅助装置治疗作为移植桥与非桥接心脏受体的成本效益比较。
Circulation. 2013 Jun 18;127(24):2424-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000194. Epub 2013 May 22.
6
Post-approval study of a highly pulsed, low-shear-rate, continuous-flow, left ventricular assist device, EVAHEART: a Japanese multicenter study using J-MACS.高脉冲、低剪切率、连续流左心室辅助装置EVAHEART的上市后研究:一项使用J-MACS的日本多中心研究
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jun;33(6):599-608. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
7
Improved survival after heart transplantation in patients with bridge to transplant in the recent era: a 17-year single-center experience.近期时代中接受过渡到移植治疗的心脏移植患者生存率提高:一项为期17年的单中心经验。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Jun;28(6):591-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 May 5.
8
Role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients awaiting heart transplant in the continuous-flow left ventricular assist device era.在连续血流左心室辅助装置时代,植入式心脏除颤器在等待心脏移植患者中的作用。
Artif Organs. 2021 Aug;45(8):845-851. doi: 10.1111/aor.13927. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
9
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
10
[Ventricular assist device and heart transplantation in Japan].[日本的心室辅助装置与心脏移植]
Masui. 2009 Mar;58(3):327-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status of extracorporeal ventricular assist devices in Japan.日本体外心室辅助装置的现状
J Artif Organs. 2014 Sep;17(3):211-9. doi: 10.1007/s10047-014-0779-8. Epub 2014 Jun 22.