Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital and Northwick Park Hospital, London, Harrow, United Kingdom.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 8;62(15):1353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.082. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
The purpose of this study was to compare sulfur hexafluoride microbubble (SonoVue)-enhanced myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) relative to coronary angiography (CA) for assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Small-scale studies have shown that myocardial perfusion assessed by SonoVue-enhanced MCE is a viable alternative to SPECT for CAD assessment. However, large multicenter studies are lacking.
Patients referred for myocardial ischemia testing at 34 centers underwent rest/vasodilator SonoVue-enhanced flash-replenishment MCE, standard (99m)Tc-labeled electrocardiography-gated SPECT, and quantitative CA within 1 month. Myocardial ischemia assessments by 3 independent, blinded readers for MCE and 3 readers for SPECT were collapsed into 1 diagnosis per patient per technique and were compared to CA (reference standard) read by 1 independent blinded reader.
Of 628 enrolled patients who received SonoVue (71% males; mean age: 64 years; >1 cardiovascular [CV] risk factor in 99% of patients) 516 patients underwent all 3 examinations, of whom 161 (31.2%) had ≥70% stenosis (131 had single-vessel disease [SVD]; 30 had multivessel disease), and 310 (60.1%) had ≥50% stenosis. Higher sensitivity was obtained with MCE than with SPECT (75.2% vs. 49.1%, respectively; p < 0.0001), although specificity was lower (52.4% vs. 80.6%, respectively; p < 0.0001) for ≥70% stenosis. Similar findings were obtained for patients with ≥50% stenosis. Sensitivity levels for detection of SVD and proximal disease for ≥70% stenosis were higher for MCE (72.5% vs. 42.7%, respectively; p < 0.0001; 80% vs. 58%, respectively; p = 0.005, respectively).
SonoVue-enhanced MCE demonstrated superior sensitivity but lower specificity for detection of CAD compared to SPECT in a population with a high incidence of CV risk factors and intermediate-high prevalence of CAD. (A phase III study to compare SonoVue® enhanced myocardial echocardiography [MCE] to single photon emission computerized tomography [ECG-GATED SPECT], at rest and at peak of low-dose Dipyridamole stress test, in the assessment of significant coronary artery disease [CAD] in patients with suspect or known CAD using Coronary Angiography as Gold Standard-SonoVue MCE vs SPECT; EUCTR2007-003492-39-GR).
本研究旨在比较超声微泡对比增强心肌超声造影(MCE)与单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)相对于冠状动脉造影(CA)用于评估冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的价值。
小规模研究表明,通过 SonoVue 增强的 MCE 评估心肌灌注是 CAD 评估中 SPECT 的一种可行替代方法。然而,缺乏大规模的多中心研究。
34 个中心的疑似缺血性心脏病患者进行静息/血管扩张剂 SonoVue 增强型闪烁再填充 MCE、标准(99m)Tc 标记心电图门控 SPECT 和定量 CA 检查,在 1 个月内完成。3 位独立盲法读者对 MCE 和 3 位读者对 SPECT 的心肌缺血评估结果合并为每位患者的每种技术的 1 个诊断,并与 1 位独立盲法读者进行 CA(参考标准)阅读结果进行比较。
628 例接受 SonoVue 检查的患者(71%为男性;平均年龄:64 岁;99%的患者存在 >1 个心血管[CV]危险因素)中,516 例完成了所有 3 项检查,其中 161 例(31.2%)存在≥70%狭窄(131 例为单支血管病变[SVD];30 例为多支血管病变),310 例(60.1%)存在≥50%狭窄。与 SPECT 相比,MCE 的敏感性更高(分别为 75.2%和 49.1%;p < 0.0001),但特异性更低(分别为 52.4%和 80.6%;p < 0.0001)。对于≥50%狭窄的患者,也得到了相似的结果。对于≥70%狭窄的患者,MCE 检测 SVD 和近端病变的敏感性水平更高(分别为 72.5%和 42.7%;p < 0.0001;分别为 80%和 58%;p = 0.005)。
在具有高心血管危险因素发生率和中等至高 CAD 患病率的人群中,与 SPECT 相比,超声微泡增强 MCE 对 CAD 的检测具有更高的敏感性,但特异性较低。(一项 III 期研究,旨在比较 SonoVue®增强心肌超声心动图[MCE]与单光子发射计算机化断层扫描[SPECT],在怀疑或已知 CAD 患者中,使用冠状动脉造影作为金标准,在静息和低剂量双嘧达莫负荷试验时,评估有意义的冠状动脉疾病[CAD],SonoVue MCE vs SPECT;EUCTR2007-003492-39-GR)。