Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 12;31(36):3688-94. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.104. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
For global eradication of poliomyelitis, inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) needs to become available in all countries. Using fractional-doses (reduced-doses) may impact affordability and optimize the utilization of the production capacity. Intradermal administration has the potential to lower the dose without reducing immunogenicity. A needle-free jet injector may be a reliable way to administer vaccines intradermally. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the immunogenicity and tolerability of fractional-dose intradermal IPV (Netherlands Vaccine Institute, NVI) booster vaccination administered with a jet injector (PharmaJet) to full-dose and fractional-dose intramuscular vaccination with a needle and syringe. Immunogenicity was assessed by comparing the differences in the post-vaccination log2 geometric mean concentrations of neutralizing antibodies (GMC) between the study groups. A total of 125 Dutch adult volunteers with a well-documented vaccination history were randomized to one of four groups: full-dose intramuscular needle (IM-NS-0.5), full-dose intramuscular jet injector (IM-JI-0.5), 1/5th dose intramuscular needle (IM-NS-0.1), 1/5th dose intradermal jet injector (ID-JI-0.1). Vaccination with the JI was less painful (87% no pain) than vaccination with a NS (60% no pain), but caused more transient erythema (JI 85%, NS 24%) and swelling (JI 50%, NS 5%). Intradermal vaccination caused less vaccination site soreness (ID 16%, IM 52%). At baseline all subjects had seroprotective antibody concentrations. After 28 days, GMC were slightly lower in the ID-JI-0.1 group than in the reference group (IM-NS-0.5). The differences were not statistically significant, but the stringent non-inferiority criterion (i.e. a difference of 1 serum dilution in the microneutralization assay) was not met. After one year, differences in GMC were no longer apparent. In contrast, intramuscular vaccination with a fractional dose administered with a needle (IM-NS-0.1) was statistically inferior to full-dose intramuscular vaccination. This shows that intradermal but not intramuscular delivery of fractional-dose IPV may be sufficient for routine polio vaccination.
为了实现全球根除脊髓灰质炎的目标,各国需要提供灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(IPV)。使用小剂量(减少剂量)可能会影响可负担性,并优化生产能力的利用。皮内给药有可能在不降低免疫原性的情况下降低剂量。无针喷射注射器可能是一种可靠的皮内给药方式。这项随机对照试验的主要目的是比较使用喷射注射器(Pharmajet)进行皮内小剂量(荷兰疫苗研究所,NVI)加强免疫接种与使用针和注射器进行全剂量和小剂量肌内接种的免疫原性和耐受性。通过比较研究组之间接种后中和抗体(GMC)的对数 2 几何平均浓度的差异来评估免疫原性。共有 125 名荷兰成年志愿者,他们有详细的疫苗接种史,被随机分为四组之一:全剂量肌内针(IM-NS-0.5)、全剂量肌内喷射注射器(IM-JI-0.5)、五分之一剂量肌内针(IM-NS-0.1)、五分之一剂量皮内喷射注射器(ID-JI-0.1)。与使用 NS 相比,使用 JI 进行免疫接种(87%无疼痛)更不痛(60%无疼痛),但引起更短暂的红斑(JI 85%,NS 24%)和肿胀(JI 50%,NS 5%)。皮内接种引起的接种部位疼痛(ID 16%,IM 52%)较少。在基线时,所有受试者均具有血清保护抗体浓度。28 天后,ID-JI-0.1 组的 GMC 略低于参考组(IM-NS-0.5)。差异无统计学意义,但严格的非劣效性标准(即微量中和试验中 1 血清稀释度的差异)未得到满足。一年后,GMC 的差异不再明显。相比之下,肌内注射小剂量(IM-NS-0.1)与全剂量肌内接种相比具有统计学上的劣势。这表明皮内而非肌内给予小剂量 IPV 可能足以进行常规脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种。