Suppr超能文献

胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的三维对比增强超声:与磁共振成像的比较。

Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

机构信息

From the Departments of *Digestive Diseases and Internal Medicine, †Radiology, and ‡Surgery, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Pancreas. 2013 Oct;42(7):1164-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318291fbe5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (3D-CEUS) with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the study of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with IPMN were studied.

RESULTS

Three patients (10.0%) did not undergo diagnostic 3D-CEUS because of technical problems. Three dimensional CEUS identified 12 (44.4%) main-duct IPMNs versus no cases by MRI (P < 0.001). Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm localization showed poor agreement between 3D-CEUS and MRI (κ = 0.058), whereas good agreement was found in detecting the pancreatic calcifications (κ = 1.000). Significant differences between 3D-CEUS and MRI were found regarding the number of lesions detected (1.4 ± 0.8 vs 3.8 ± 3.6; P < 0.001), the detection of mucinous plugs (3.7% vs 50.0%; P < 0.001), chronic pancreatitis (7.4% vs 26.7%; P = 0.031), pancreatic atrophy (0% vs 50.0%; P < 0.001), thick septa (22.2% vs 53.3%; P = 0.004), and mural nodules (25.9% vs 3.3%; P = 0.016). Three dimensional CEUS showed similar results as compared with MRI in evaluating IPMNs smaller than 1 cm of diameter or greater than 2 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if MRI remains the criterion standard technique for the diagnosis of IPMNs, 3D-CEUS can be safely used to follow patients with IPMNs of less than 1 cm.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在前瞻性比较三维对比增强超声(3D-CEUS)与磁共振成像(MRI)在胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)研究中的诊断准确性。

方法

连续纳入 30 例 IPMN 患者。

结果

由于技术问题,有 3 例(10.0%)患者未行诊断性 3D-CEUS。3D-CEUS 共检出 12 例(44.4%)主胰管 IPMN,而 MRI 无一例检出(P<0.001)。3D-CEUS 与 MRI 对 IPMN 定位的一致性较差(κ=0.058),而对胰腺钙化的检测一致性较好(κ=1.000)。3D-CEUS 与 MRI 之间在检出病灶数量(1.4±0.8 比 3.8±3.6;P<0.001)、黏液栓检出(3.7%比 50.0%;P<0.001)、慢性胰腺炎(7.4%比 26.7%;P=0.031)、胰腺萎缩(0%比 50.0%;P<0.001)、厚分隔(22.2%比 53.3%;P=0.004)和壁结节(25.9%比 3.3%;P=0.016)方面存在显著差异。3D-CEUS 在评估直径小于 1cm 或大于 2cm 的 IPMNs 方面与 MRI 具有相似的结果。

结论

尽管 MRI 仍是 IPMN 诊断的标准技术,但 3D-CEUS 可安全用于直径小于 1cm 的 IPMN 患者的随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验