From the Departments of *Digestive Diseases and Internal Medicine, †Radiology, and ‡Surgery, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Pancreas. 2013 Oct;42(7):1164-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318291fbe5.
The objective of this study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (3D-CEUS) with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the study of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas.
Thirty consecutive patients with IPMN were studied.
Three patients (10.0%) did not undergo diagnostic 3D-CEUS because of technical problems. Three dimensional CEUS identified 12 (44.4%) main-duct IPMNs versus no cases by MRI (P < 0.001). Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm localization showed poor agreement between 3D-CEUS and MRI (κ = 0.058), whereas good agreement was found in detecting the pancreatic calcifications (κ = 1.000). Significant differences between 3D-CEUS and MRI were found regarding the number of lesions detected (1.4 ± 0.8 vs 3.8 ± 3.6; P < 0.001), the detection of mucinous plugs (3.7% vs 50.0%; P < 0.001), chronic pancreatitis (7.4% vs 26.7%; P = 0.031), pancreatic atrophy (0% vs 50.0%; P < 0.001), thick septa (22.2% vs 53.3%; P = 0.004), and mural nodules (25.9% vs 3.3%; P = 0.016). Three dimensional CEUS showed similar results as compared with MRI in evaluating IPMNs smaller than 1 cm of diameter or greater than 2 cm.
Even if MRI remains the criterion standard technique for the diagnosis of IPMNs, 3D-CEUS can be safely used to follow patients with IPMNs of less than 1 cm.
本研究旨在前瞻性比较三维对比增强超声(3D-CEUS)与磁共振成像(MRI)在胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)研究中的诊断准确性。
连续纳入 30 例 IPMN 患者。
由于技术问题,有 3 例(10.0%)患者未行诊断性 3D-CEUS。3D-CEUS 共检出 12 例(44.4%)主胰管 IPMN,而 MRI 无一例检出(P<0.001)。3D-CEUS 与 MRI 对 IPMN 定位的一致性较差(κ=0.058),而对胰腺钙化的检测一致性较好(κ=1.000)。3D-CEUS 与 MRI 之间在检出病灶数量(1.4±0.8 比 3.8±3.6;P<0.001)、黏液栓检出(3.7%比 50.0%;P<0.001)、慢性胰腺炎(7.4%比 26.7%;P=0.031)、胰腺萎缩(0%比 50.0%;P<0.001)、厚分隔(22.2%比 53.3%;P=0.004)和壁结节(25.9%比 3.3%;P=0.016)方面存在显著差异。3D-CEUS 在评估直径小于 1cm 或大于 2cm 的 IPMNs 方面与 MRI 具有相似的结果。
尽管 MRI 仍是 IPMN 诊断的标准技术,但 3D-CEUS 可安全用于直径小于 1cm 的 IPMN 患者的随访。