• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创根治性膀胱切除术的现状:基于结果的比较。

Current status of minimally invasive radical cystectomy: an outcome-based comparison.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013 Jun;13(6):681-95. doi: 10.1586/era.13.59.

DOI:10.1586/era.13.59
PMID:23773103
Abstract

Minimally invasive approaches to radical cystectomy are 20 years old. Available data suggest that minimally invasive radical cystectomy can provide comparable outcomes to open radical cystectomy despite the scarcity of level 1-2 evidence. Perioperative, functional and early oncologic outcomes seem comparable between the two surgical approaches. Robotic technology has allowed more surgeons to perform minimally invasive radical cystectomy and has simplified technically demanding steps that posed problems in conventional laparoscopy. This is evident by the rapid dissemination of robotics in many bladder cancer centers worldwide and by the numerous emerging series of robot-assisted intracorporeal urinary diversion. Until more data are available regarding the oncologic performance of minimally invasive radical cystectomy, open radical cystectomy remains the gold standard procedure for now.

摘要

微创根治性膀胱切除术已有 20 年的历史。现有数据表明,微创根治性膀胱切除术可提供与开放性根治性膀胱切除术相当的结果,尽管缺乏 1-2 级证据。两种手术方法的围手术期、功能和早期肿瘤学结果似乎相似。机器人技术使更多的外科医生能够进行微创根治性膀胱切除术,并简化了在传统腹腔镜手术中存在问题的技术要求高的步骤。这一点可以从机器人技术在全球许多膀胱癌中心的迅速传播以及众多新兴的机器人辅助体内尿流改道术系列中得到证明。在关于微创根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学表现的更多数据可用之前,开放性根治性膀胱切除术目前仍是金标准手术。

相似文献

1
Current status of minimally invasive radical cystectomy: an outcome-based comparison.微创根治性膀胱切除术的现状:基于结果的比较。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013 Jun;13(6):681-95. doi: 10.1586/era.13.59.
2
The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications.腹腔镜和机器人膀胱切除术在肌层浸润性膀胱癌治疗中的作用,特别强调肿瘤控制和并发症。
Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):767-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 May 17.
3
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: long-term outcomes.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:长期疗效
Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Mar;18(2):167-72. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f4a9dd.
4
Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results.机器人辅助与开放根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的前瞻性随机对照研究:围手术期和病理结果。
Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.024. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
5
Total intracorporeal robotic cystectomy: are we there yet?完全经体腔内机器人辅助膀胱切除术:我们做到了吗?
Curr Opin Urol. 2013 Mar;23(2):135-40. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835d4cda.
6
Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a critical analysis.腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:一项批判性分析
Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.076. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
7
Oncological and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: critical review of current status.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能学结果:现状的批判性评价。
Urology. 2011 Nov;78(5):977-84. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.073. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
8
Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: current technique and outcomes.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术:当前技术和结果。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2012 Jul;12(7):913-7. doi: 10.1586/era.12.65.
9
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术治疗膀胱移行细胞癌。
Eur Urol. 2011 Nov;60(5):1066-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.035. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
10
Oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: open versus minimally invasive approaches.膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学结果:开放性与微创方法比较。
J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):862-69. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.019. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical and pathological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the community setting.社区环境下机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的手术及病理结果
J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):337-341. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0740-y. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
2
Robotic radical cystectomy: intracorporeal versus extracorporeal versus orthotopic neobladder-Which is better?机器人根治性膀胱切除术:体内与体外以及原位新膀胱——哪种更好?
World J Urol. 2016 Oct;34(10):1501-2. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1783-9. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
3
Robotic versus open radical cystectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术:一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 31;10(3):e0121032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121032. eCollection 2015.
4
Expression patterns and prognostic role of transketolase-like 1 in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.转酮醇酶样1在肌层浸润性膀胱癌中的表达模式及预后作用
World J Urol. 2015 Oct;33(10):1403-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1473-4. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
5
Long-term urodynamic evaluation of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder for bladder cancer.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术联合原位回肠新膀胱术治疗膀胱癌的长期尿动力学评估
Oncol Lett. 2014 Sep;8(3):1031-1034. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2281. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
6
A feasibility study of peritoneum preservation in radical cystectomy with extraperitonealization of orthotopic neobladder for invasive high-grade bladder cancer: a preliminary analysis.浸润性高级别膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术中保留腹膜并行原位新膀胱腹膜外重建的可行性研究:初步分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Jun;46(6):1107-13. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0632-7. Epub 2013 Dec 20.