Liver Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Hepatology. 2013 Dec;58(6):2142-52. doi: 10.1002/hep.26578. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) practice guidelines provide recommendations in diagnosing and managing patients with liver disease from available scientific evidence in combination with expert consensus opinions. The aim was to systematically review the evolution of recommendations from AASLD guidelines and identify gaps limiting the evidence-based foundations of these guidelines. Initial and current AASLD guidelines published from January 1998 to August 2012 were reviewed. The AGREE II instrument was used to evaluate rigor and transparency of guideline development. The number of recommendations, distribution of grades (strength or certainty), classes (benefit versus risk), and types of recommendations were evaluated. Whenever possible, multiple versions were evaluated for evolving scientific evidence. A total of 991 recommendations from 28 guidelines on 17 topics were evaluated. From initial to current guidelines, the total number of recommendations increased by 36% (512 to 699). The largest increases were from chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) (+71), liver transplantation (+53), and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (+27). Most current recommendations are grade II (44%) and less than 20% are grade I. The AGREE II evaluation showed global improvement in guideline quality. Both HBV and chronic hepatitis C guidelines had greatest increases in grade I recommendations (+383% and +67%, respectively). The greatest increases in treatment recommendations were from HBV (grade I, +1,150%), liver transplantation (grade II, +112%), and AIH (grade III, +105%).
Despite significant increases in the numbers of recommendations within AASLD practice guidelines over time, only a minority are supported by grade I evidence, highlighting the need for developing well-designed investigations to provide evidence for areas of uncertainty and improving the quality of future guidelines in hepatobiliary diseases.
美国肝脏研究协会(AASLD)实践指南提供了基于现有科学证据并结合专家共识意见的肝脏疾病患者诊断和治疗建议。其目的是系统地回顾 AASLD 指南中建议的演变,并确定限制这些指南基于证据基础的局限性。评估了从 1998 年 1 月至 2012 年 8 月发布的初始和当前 AASLD 指南。使用 AGREE II 工具评估指南制定的严谨性和透明度。评估了建议的数量、分级(强度或确定性)的分布、类别(获益与风险)和推荐类型。只要有可能,就会评估多个版本以评估不断变化的科学证据。评估了 17 个主题的 28 个指南中的 991 项建议。从初始指南到当前指南,建议总数增加了 36%(从 512 项增加到 699 项)。增加最多的是慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)(增加 71%)、肝移植(增加 53%)和自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)(增加 27%)。目前大多数建议的级别为 II 级(44%),不到 20%为 I 级。AGREE II 评估显示指南质量有了全面提高。HBV 和慢性丙型肝炎指南中 I 级建议的增加最多(分别增加 383%和 67%)。HBV(I 级,增加 1150%)、肝移植(II 级,增加 112%)和 AIH(III 级,增加 105%)的治疗建议增加最多。
尽管 AASLD 实践指南中的建议数量随着时间的推移显著增加,但只有少数建议得到 I 级证据的支持,这突出表明需要进行精心设计的研究,为不确定领域提供证据,并提高肝胆疾病未来指南的质量。