[Traditional and digital urography compared. The authors' own experience].

A computed radiographic system for generating and archiving digital radiographic images was employed in ivp. The system produces 2 digital images per exposure: the first one simulates a conventional radiograph, while the second enhances some spatial frequencies and emphasizes the structure borders. The conventional radiographs and the digital images of 50 patients submitted to ivp were reviewed by four experienced radiologists to evaluate their comparative quality, and the results were statistically analyzed. Digital images proved to be better than conventional radiographs for some of the selected parameters, especially in the evaluation of renal edges and sometimes for calyceal opacification. As for the other parameters, no statistically significant difference was observed between conventional radiographs and digital images.