Vancouver General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Jim Pattison Pavilion South, 899 West 12th Ave. Room G861, Vancouver BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Sep;82(9):1571-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.043. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
To evaluate the effect of a cardiac bowtie-shaped filter in an ultra high pitch CTPA protocol at 100 kV on image quality and radiation dose.
Retrospective study of 100 patients referred for CTPA. 50 patients scanned with a standard 100 kV protocol at pitch 2.8 (Protocol A) and 50 patients scanned with a 100 kV protocol at pitch 3.2 with a cardiac bowtie-shaped filter (Protocol B). All other scanning parameters kept constant. Images from both groups reconstructed with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction. Central pulmonary vessel attenuation and background noise were quantitatively measured and signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) were calculated. Two radiologists performed qualitative assessment grading visualization of the pulmonary vasculature and noise level. CTDIvol and DLP were recorded and effective dose was calculated.
CTDIvol, DLP and effective dose were significantly (p<0.0001) lower in Protocol B (2.3 ± 0.5 mGy, 78.4 ± 16.5 mGycm, 1.4 ± 0.3 mSy, respectively) compared to Protocol A (4.3 ± 0.5 mGy, 152.0 ± 19.6 mGycm, 2.7 ± 0.3 mSy, respectively). Protocol B had significantly (p<0.0001) higher noise than Protocol A (23.8 ± 6.9 HU vs 36.8 ± 7.3 HU) and lower SNR (11.8 ± 3.7 HU vs 19.2 ± 8.1 HU) and CNR (10.3 ± 3.7 HU vs 24.9 ± 13.4 HU) but there was no significant difference in the subjective visualization of the pulmonary vasculature (p=0.63). Furthermore, iterative reconstruction significantly (p<0.0001) improves image noise (29.4 ± 5.5 HU from 36.8 ± 7.3 HU).
The addition of a cardiac bowtie-shaped filter with an ultra high pitch CTPA protocol at 100 kV resulted in a 48% dose reduction without significantly affecting diagnostic image quality. In addition, the use of iterative reconstruction significantly improves image quality by reducing noise permitting the possibility for further dose reduction strategies.
评估在 100kV 超高管电压 CTPA 协议中使用心脏蝶形滤器对图像质量和辐射剂量的影响。
回顾性研究 100 例接受 CTPA 检查的患者。50 例患者采用标准 100kV 协议(管电压 2.8,Pitch 2.8)(Protocol A)进行扫描,50 例患者采用 100kV 协议(管电压 3.2,Pitch 3.2)加心脏蝶形滤器进行扫描(Protocol B)。所有其他扫描参数保持不变。两组均采用滤波反投影和迭代重建进行图像重建。定量测量中心肺动脉的衰减和背景噪声,并计算信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)。两位放射科医生对肺动脉可视化和噪声水平进行定性评估。记录 CTDIvol 和 DLP,并计算有效剂量。
Protocol B(2.3±0.5mGy、78.4±16.5mGy·cm、1.4±0.3mSy)的 CTDIvol、DLP 和有效剂量明显低于 Protocol A(4.3±0.5mGy、152.0±19.6mGy·cm、2.7±0.3mSy)(均 P<0.0001)。Protocol B 的噪声明显高于 Protocol A(23.8±6.9HU 比 36.8±7.3HU),而 SNR(11.8±3.7HU 比 19.2±8.1HU)和 CNR(10.3±3.7HU 比 24.9±13.4HU)则较低,但肺动脉可视化的主观评估无显著差异(P=0.63)。此外,迭代重建显著改善图像噪声(从 36.8±7.3HU 降至 29.4±5.5HU,P<0.0001)。
在 100kV 超高管电压 CTPA 协议中添加心脏蝶形滤器可使剂量降低 48%,而不会明显影响诊断图像质量。此外,使用迭代重建可通过降低噪声显著改善图像质量,从而有可能进一步降低剂量。