• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[晚期痴呆症中的安乐死:预嘱是有用的]

[Euthanasia in advanced dementia: directive is useful].

作者信息

Wijsbek Henri

机构信息

Universiteit van Amsterdam, afd. Wijsbegeerte, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(25):A6440.

PMID:23777971
Abstract

The Dutch Euthanasia Act states that an advance directive can replace an actual request for euthanasia in cases in which a patient has become unable to make autonomous decisions. In Euthanasia and the Severely Demented, I agree with Keizer that the severely demented can suffer unbearably, but contrary to Keizer I do not believe that it is impossible to state in advance the conditions under which one would not wish to go on living any longer. Consequently, euthanasia can be permissible even in patients with late-stage dementia, provided that the other due-care criteria are met. Permissibility by itself, however, will not settle disputes about borderline cases. Due to the erratic course of the disease, the right moment for euthanasia may very well be impossible to determine.

摘要

荷兰《安乐死法案》规定,在患者已无法做出自主决定的情况下,预先指示可替代实际的安乐死请求。在《安乐死与重度痴呆患者》一文中,我同意凯泽的观点,即重度痴呆患者可能会遭受无法忍受的痛苦,但与凯泽不同的是,我认为预先说明在哪些情况下人们不希望继续活下去并非不可能。因此,只要符合其他适当护理标准,即使是晚期痴呆患者的安乐死也可以是允许的。然而,仅仅允许并不能解决关于临界情况的争议。由于该疾病病程不稳定,很可能无法确定安乐死的合适时机。

相似文献

1
[Euthanasia in advanced dementia: directive is useful].[晚期痴呆症中的安乐死:预嘱是有用的]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(25):A6440.
2
[Euthanasia in advanced dementia: a moral impossibility].[晚期痴呆患者的安乐死:一种道德上的不可能]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(25):A6407.
3
Physicians' experiences with demented patients with advance euthanasia directives in the Netherlands.荷兰医生对患有晚期安乐死指令的痴呆患者的治疗经历。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jul;53(7):1138-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53354.x.
4
[Euthanasia in an advanced state of dementia: a verdict and its reception in the medical world].[晚期痴呆症患者的安乐死:一项裁决及其在医学界的反响]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2024 Aug 26;168:D8216.
5
Opinions about euthanasia and advanced dementia: a qualitative study among Dutch physicians and members of the general public.关于安乐死和晚期痴呆症的观点:荷兰医生和普通公众的定性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jan 28;16:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-16-7.
6
First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?2002 年安乐死法案通过以来首位荷兰医生被起诉:判决意味着什么?
J Med Ethics. 2020 Feb;46(2):71-75. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105877. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
Advance directives for euthanasia in dementia: how do they affect resident care in Dutch nursing homes? Experiences of physicians and relatives.在痴呆症中实施安乐死的预先指示:它们如何影响荷兰养老院的居民护理?医生和亲属的经验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jun;59(6):989-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03414.x. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
8
The dementia dilemma.
Perspect Biol Med. 1999 Winter;42(2):174-8. doi: 10.1353/pbm.1999.0057.
9
Would we rather lose our life than lose our self? Lessons from the Dutch debate on euthanasia for patients with dementia.我们宁愿失去生命也不愿失去自我吗?荷兰关于痴呆症患者安乐死辩论的启示。
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Apr;7(4):48-56. doi: 10.1080/15265160701220881.
10
Advance directives, dementia, and physician-assisted death.预先指示、痴呆症和医师协助死亡。
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Summer;41(2):484-500. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12057.