National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission, Atlanta, Georgia 30326, USA.
Nurse Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):133-4. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e318296dbb8.
Questions arrive at the National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (NLNAC) through several avenues. Nurse administrators and faculty members often call the NLNAC professional staff members to inquire about their program's compliance with the accreditation standards as they implement changes or discuss potential program revisions with their colleagues. Frequently, we receive e-mail messages from students, particularly graduate students, as well as from the nurse administrators and faculty members. In addition, we enjoy the energizing dialogue at the self-study forums during which attendees bring forth their questions and concerns related to accreditation. The attendees may also leave question cards with the NLNAC staff, and the questions on these cards are answered through phone calls and e-mail messages following the forum. The questions in this issue of the column are taken from the many questions received at the most recent self-study forum.
问题通过多种途径到达美国护理联盟认证委员会（NLNAC）。护士管理人员和教师经常打电话给 NLNAC 的专业人员，询问他们的课程是否符合认证标准，因为他们在实施变更或与同事讨论潜在的课程修订时。我们经常收到学生（尤其是研究生）、护士管理人员和教师的电子邮件。此外，我们还喜欢在自学论坛上进行活跃的对话，与会者在论坛上提出与认证相关的问题和关注。与会者还可以向 NLNAC 工作人员留下问题卡，这些卡片上的问题将在论坛结束后通过电话和电子邮件回答。本期专栏的问题取自最近的自学论坛上收到的众多问题。
