Center for Translational Injury Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1 Suppl 1):S16-23. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828fa535.
The classic definition of massive transfusion, 10 or more units of red blood cells (RBCs) in 24 hours, has never been demonstrated as a valid surrogate for severe hemorrhage and can introduce survival bias. In addition, the definition fails to capture other products that the clinician may have immediately available, and may use, during the initial resuscitation. Assuming that units of resuscitative fluids reflect patient illness, our objective was to identify a rate of resuscitation intensity (RI) that could serve as an early surrogate of sickness for patients with substantial bleeding after injury.
Adult patients surviving at least 30 minutes after admission and receiving one or more RBCs within 6 hours of admission from 10 US Level 1 trauma centers were enrolled in the PRospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) study. Total fluid units were calculated as the sum of the number of crystalloid units (1 L = 1 U), colloids (0.5 L = 1 U), and blood products (1 RBC = 1 U, 1 plasma = 1 U, 6 pack platelets = 1 U). Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate associations between RI and 6-hour mortality, adjusting for age, center, penetrating injury, weighted Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS).
A total of 1,096 eligible patients received resuscitative fluids within 30 minutes, including 620 transfused with blood products. Despite varying products used, the total fluid RI was similar across all sites (3.2 ± 2.5 U). Patients who received four or more units of any resuscitative fluid had a 6-hour mortality rate of 14.4% versus 4.5% in patients who received less than 4 U. The adjusted odds ratio of 6-hour mortality for patients receiving 4 U or more within 30 minutes was 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.5).
Resuscitation with four or more units of any fluid was significantly associated with 6-hour mortality. This study suggests that early RI regardless of fluid type can be used as a surrogate for sickness and mortality in severely bleeding patients.
经典的大量输血定义为 24 小时内输注 10 个或更多单位的红细胞(RBC),从未被证明是严重出血的有效替代指标,并且可能会引入生存偏差。此外,该定义未能捕获临床医生在初始复苏期间可能立即获得并使用的其他产品。假设复苏液的单位反映了患者的病情,我们的目标是确定一种复苏强度(RI)率,该速率可以作为受伤后大量出血患者疾病早期的替代指标。
从美国 10 个 1 级创伤中心收治的至少在入院后 30 分钟存活并在入院后 6 小时内接受 1 个或多个 RBC 的成年患者被纳入前瞻性观察性多中心重大创伤输血(PROMMTT)研究。总液体单位计算为晶体液单位数(1L=1U)、胶体液单位数(0.5L=1U)和血液制品单位数(1RBC=1U、1 血浆=1U、6 袋血小板=1U)的总和。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归评估 RI 与 6 小时死亡率之间的关联,调整因素包括年龄、中心、穿透伤、加权修订创伤评分(RTS)和损伤严重程度评分(ISS)。
共有 1096 名符合条件的患者在 30 分钟内接受了复苏液治疗,其中 620 名患者接受了血液制品治疗。尽管使用的产品不同,但所有地点的总液体 RI 相似(3.2±2.5U)。在 30 分钟内接受 4 个或更多单位任何复苏液的患者 6 小时死亡率为 14.4%,而接受少于 4U 复苏液的患者 6 小时死亡率为 4.5%。在 30 分钟内接受 4U 或更多单位任何液体的患者,6 小时死亡率的调整比值比为 2.1(95%置信区间,1.2-3.5)。
接受 4 个或更多单位任何液体的复苏与 6 小时死亡率显著相关。这项研究表明,无论液体类型如何,早期 RI 都可以用作严重出血患者疾病和死亡率的替代指标。