Center for Translational Injury Research, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1 Suppl 1):S31-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828fa3ed.
There are few clinical data to guide the use of cryoprecipitate in severely injured trauma patients. Cryoprecipitate is a rich source of fibrinogen and has been associated with improved survival in animal as well as limited human studies. Our objectives were to identify patterns and predictors of cryoprecipitate use and determine whether transfusing cryoprecipitate was associated with improved survival.
This secondary analysis of 1,238 of 1,245 PRospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) study patients who had timed transfusion data included 359 (29%) who received cryoprecipitate. For this analysis, one dose of cryoprecipitate was defined as 10 U. Unadjusted predictors of cryoprecipitate use were identified using logistic regression. Multivariable time-dependent Cox models were performed to examine the association of cryoprecipitate on time to in-hospital death.
Cryoprecipitate use varied significantly by center, ranging from 7% to 82%. Among patients who received cryoprecipitate, the median number of units infused by 24 hours was 10 (interquartile range, 10-20). The median time from admission to first cryoprecipitate unit was 2.7 hours (interquartile range, 1.7-4.4 hours). Of those who died of a hemorrhagic death within 6 hours of admission, 72% received no cryoprecipitate. Other unadjusted predictors of cryoprecipitate use included Injury Severity Score (ISS), initial fibrinogen levels, base deficit, international normalized ratio, prothrombin time/partial thromboplastin time, hemoglobin, damage-control surgery, and surgical intervention of the chest and abdomen. Cryoprecipitate use was not associated with in-hospital mortality after adjusting for initial pH, initial hemoglobin, emergency department systolic blood pressure, emergency department Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, blood product use, ISS, and center.
Ten US Level 1 trauma centers vary greatly in their timing and use of cryoprecipitate in severely injured trauma patients. We could not identify any association of cryoprecipitate use with in-hospital mortality, although most patients did not receive this product. Randomized controlled studies are needed to determine if cryoprecipitate (or fibrinogen concentrates) have a beneficial effect.
目前仅有少量临床数据可用于指导严重创伤患者使用冷沉淀。冷沉淀富含纤维蛋白原,动物研究和有限的人类研究均表明其与生存率提高相关。我们的目标是确定冷沉淀使用的模式和预测因素,并确定输注冷沉淀是否与生存率提高相关。
对 PROMMTT 研究的 1238 例患者中的 1245 例患者(359 例接受冷沉淀)进行二次分析,这些患者具有定时输血数据。在此分析中,一剂冷沉淀定义为 10U。使用逻辑回归确定冷沉淀使用的未调整预测因素。采用多变量时间依赖性 Cox 模型检查冷沉淀对住院内死亡时间的影响。
冷沉淀的使用在各中心之间差异显著,范围为 7%至 82%。在接受冷沉淀的患者中,24 小时内输注的单位中位数为 10(四分位间距,10-20)。从入院到首次输注冷沉淀的中位时间为 2.7 小时(四分位间距,1.7-4.4 小时)。在入院后 6 小时内死于出血性死亡的患者中,72%未接受冷沉淀。冷沉淀使用的其他未调整预测因素包括损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、初始纤维蛋白原水平、基础缺陷、国际标准化比值、凝血酶原时间/部分凝血活酶时间、血红蛋白、控制性手术以及胸部和腹部手术干预。在校正初始 pH 值、初始血红蛋白、急诊室收缩压、急诊室格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、血液制品使用、ISS 和中心后,冷沉淀的使用与住院内死亡率无关。
美国 10 个 1 级创伤中心在严重创伤患者中冷沉淀的使用时机和剂量差异很大。尽管大多数患者未接受该产品,但我们未能确定冷沉淀的使用与住院内死亡率之间存在任何关联。需要进行随机对照研究以确定冷沉淀(或纤维蛋白原浓缩物)是否具有有益作用。