Friis-Hasché E, Hutchings B
Tandlaegebladet. 1990 Jan;94(2):46-9.
The recording procedure is an especially important aspect of the psychologic treatment, since it contributes to the establishment of confidence between the dentist and his patient, and as such is an essential prerequisite to a successful treatment. The article argues that the registration should concern itself with situations and stimuli which have a traumatic character and with the associated learning processes. Furthermore recording of changes in behavior, somatic aspects of anxiety and of the emotional and cognitive aspects of anxiety should be involved. Based on these general requirements, recording of phobias has five main purposes: Firstly, a recording should contribute to a reliable diagnosis or a sufficiently differentiated description of the phobia that one can offer the best possible treatment and prognosis evaluation. Secondly, the recording should ensure that one can evaluate the effects of different types of treatment or the effects of correction of already initiated treatments. Thirdly, recording should contribute to testing the validity of various models of phobia, and by this means attempt to produce new and better hypotheses for the origin of phobias, their extent, treatment and prevention. Fourthly registration should ensure that different recorders and therapists work with as uniform a conception of phobias as possible, (continual calibration). Finally a registration should be of such a nature that it can be incorporated in an epidemiologic study. In addition to the interview method, the article considers the various objective psychologic and physiological instruments available for the registration of components of anxiety and especially dental anxiety. Weaknesses and sources of error in relation to the reliability and validity of these methods are discussed.
记录过程是心理治疗中一个特别重要的方面,因为它有助于在牙医和患者之间建立信任,因此是成功治疗的必要前提。文章认为,记录应关注具有创伤性特征的情况和刺激以及相关的学习过程。此外,还应记录行为变化、焦虑的躯体方面以及焦虑的情绪和认知方面。基于这些一般要求,恐惧症的记录有五个主要目的:首先,记录应有助于对恐惧症进行可靠的诊断或充分区分性的描述,以便能够提供尽可能最佳的治疗和预后评估。其次,记录应确保能够评估不同类型治疗的效果或对已开始治疗的矫正效果。第三,记录应有助于检验各种恐惧症模型的有效性,并借此尝试为恐惧症的起源、程度、治疗和预防提出新的更好的假设。第四,记录应确保不同的记录者和治疗师对恐惧症的概念尽可能统一(持续校准)。最后,记录应具有可纳入流行病学研究的性质。除了访谈方法外,文章还考虑了可用于记录焦虑成分尤其是牙科焦虑成分的各种客观心理和生理工具。讨论了这些方法在可靠性和有效性方面的弱点和误差来源。