Suppr超能文献

巨噬细胞 M1/M2 极化在新型隐球菌感染中动态适应细胞因子微环境的变化。

Macrophage M1/M2 polarization dynamically adapts to changes in cytokine microenvironments in Cryptococcus neoformans infection.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

mBio. 2013 Jun 18;4(3):e00264-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00264-13.

Abstract

The outcome of cryptococcal pneumonia correlates with local macrophage polarization status, as M1 and M2 polarization marks protective and nonprotective responses, respectively. Overall, pulmonary macrophage polarization status changes over time during a cryptococcal infection. This could have been caused by repolarization of individual macrophages or by a replacement of M2-polarized cells by new M1-polarized cells. To explore the ability of macrophages to change between polarization states, we conducted a series of experiments using in vitro macrophages. Coculture of macrophages with Cryptococcus neoformans resulted in development of a weak M1-like phenotype, with modestly increased inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) but lacking interleukin 6 (IL-6) induction. The C. neoformans-induced M1-like polarization state was plastic, as macrophages stimulated first with C. neoformans and then with gamma interferon (IFN-γ) or IL-4 expressed mRNA polarization patterns similar to those stimulated with cytokines alone. To further evaluate macrophage polarization plasticity, cytokine stimulatory conditions were established which fully polarized macrophages. IFN-γ and IL-4 stimulation differentially induced complete M1 and M2 polarization, defined by differential expression of marker mRNA panels, surface marker expression, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) protein production. Switching IFN-γ- to IL-4-stimulating conditions, and vice versa, resulted in uniform changes in profiles of polarization marker genes consistent with the most recent cytokine environment. Furthermore, the ability of sequentially stimulated macrophages to inhibit C. neoformans reflected the most recent polarizing condition, independent of previous polarization. Collectively, these data indicate that M1/M2 macrophage polarization phenotypes are highly plastic to external signals, and interventions which therapeutically repolarize macrophages could be beneficial for treatment of cryptococcosis.

摘要

隐球菌性肺炎的结局与局部巨噬细胞极化状态相关,因为 M1 和 M2 极化分别代表保护性和非保护性反应。总体而言,在隐球菌感染过程中,肺部巨噬细胞的极化状态随时间而变化。这可能是由于单个巨噬细胞的再极化或 M2 极化细胞被新的 M1 极化细胞取代所致。为了探究巨噬细胞在不同极化状态之间转变的能力,我们进行了一系列体外巨噬细胞实验。巨噬细胞与新生隐球菌共培养导致出现弱 M1 样表型,诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)适度增加,但缺乏白细胞介素 6(IL-6)诱导。新生隐球菌诱导的 M1 样极化状态是可塑的,因为先用新生隐球菌刺激巨噬细胞,然后用γ干扰素(IFN-γ)或白细胞介素 4(IL-4)刺激,巨噬细胞表达的 mRNA 极化模式与单独用细胞因子刺激的模式相似。为了进一步评估巨噬细胞极化的可塑性,建立了可使巨噬细胞完全极化的细胞因子刺激条件。IFN-γ和 IL-4 刺激可分别诱导完全的 M1 和 M2 极化,其特征为标记 mRNA 面板、表面标记表达和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)蛋白产生的差异表达。将 IFN-γ 刺激条件转换为 IL-4 刺激条件,反之亦然,会导致极化标记基因的特征谱发生一致的变化,与最近的细胞因子环境一致。此外,顺序刺激巨噬细胞抑制新生隐球菌的能力反映了最近的极化条件,而与先前的极化无关。总的来说,这些数据表明 M1/M2 巨噬细胞极化表型对外界信号高度可塑,并且治疗性地使巨噬细胞再极化的干预措施可能有益于治疗隐球菌病。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c69/3684832/479ee5ac3ea9/mbo0031315400001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验