Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2012 Apr 30;2(2):202a02. doi: 10.5826/dpc.0202a02. Print 2012 Apr.
Dermatopathology represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of skin diseases and neoplasms that cannot be diagnosed on clinical grounds alone. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and to assess the accuracy of an Internet-based real-time (live) teledermatopathology consultation. Twenty teaching cases and 10 randomly selected routine cases were presented to four expert dermatopathologists, first by real-time teledermatopathology and, subsequently, in a blinded fashion, using light microscopy. Throughout the study the overall diagnostic accuracy did not differ for the two methods. However, the mean level of confidence and the mean observation times differed significantly between real-time teledermatopathology and light microscopy (92.6±0.24% versus 99.5±0.02%, and 96.31±11.55 sec versus 25.47±3.85 sec, respectively). Assessment of routine cases did not produce significant diagnostic differences between the two methods. These results prove that real-time teledermatopathology offers an affordable and technically simple technology that lends itself to training as well as to diagnosis of lesions from routine practice by experts situated at remote sites.
皮肤病理学是诊断仅凭临床依据无法确诊的皮肤疾病和肿瘤的金标准。本研究旨在测试基于互联网的实时(在线)远程皮肤病理学咨询的可行性,并评估其准确性。20 个教学案例和 10 个随机选择的常规案例首先通过实时远程皮肤病理学呈现给四位专家皮肤科病理学家,然后以盲法方式使用光学显微镜进行呈现。在整个研究过程中,两种方法的总体诊断准确性没有差异。然而,实时远程皮肤病理学和光学显微镜之间的平均置信水平和平均观察时间存在显著差异(分别为 92.6±0.24%和 99.5±0.02%,96.31±11.55 秒和 25.47±3.85 秒)。对常规病例的评估并未显示两种方法之间存在显著的诊断差异。这些结果证明,实时远程皮肤病理学提供了一种经济实惠且技术简单的技术,既适合远程站点的专家进行培训,也适合诊断常规实践中的病变。