• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《初乳喂养调查修订版：母乳喂养的累积评估》

Revision of the Beginning Breastfeeding Survey: a cumulative assessment of breastfeeding.

作者信息

Mulder Pamela

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1121, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Meas. 2013;21(1):80-95. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.21.1.80.

DOI:10.1891/1061-3749.21.1.80
PMID:23786136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4684169/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Women use their cumulative breastfeeding experiences, in combination with other factors, to make their infant feeding decisions. This pilot study assessed the reliability and predictive validity of the revised Beginning Breastfeeding Survey-Cumulative (BBS-C).

METHODS

25 women were recruited prenatally from a university hospital. The BBS-C was completed before hospital discharge. Infant feeding outcomes were measured at 1 and 3 months postpartum.

RESULTS

Participants were 17-40 years old, mostly married, Whites, and well-educated. Coefficient alpha was .92-.94. The BBS-C predicted an infant not receiving breast milk, not feeding from the breast, and receiving infant formula feedings.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample, the BBS-C had strong reliability and predictive validity. Further testing should assess reliability and predictive validity in a wider range of populations and settings.

摘要

背景与目的

女性会结合自身累积的母乳喂养经历及其他因素来做出婴儿喂养决策。这项试点研究评估了修订后的《初产妇母乳喂养调查-累积版》（BBS-C）的信度和预测效度。

方法

从一家大学医院产前招募了25名女性。BBS-C在出院前完成。产后1个月和3个月时测量婴儿喂养结果。

结果

参与者年龄在17至40岁之间，大多已婚，为白人，且受教育程度较高。α系数为0.92至0.94。BBS-C预测婴儿未接受母乳、未进行亲喂以及接受配方奶喂养。

结论

在该样本中，BBS-C具有较高的信度和预测效度。进一步的测试应评估在更广泛人群和环境中的信度和预测效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31c/4684169/9796c4cb8d5c/nihms-665954-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31c/4684169/26e1a9cf8e4b/nihms-665954-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31c/4684169/9796c4cb8d5c/nihms-665954-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31c/4684169/26e1a9cf8e4b/nihms-665954-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31c/4684169/9796c4cb8d5c/nihms-665954-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Revision of the Beginning Breastfeeding Survey: a cumulative assessment of breastfeeding.《初乳喂养调查修订版：母乳喂养的累积评估》
J Nurs Meas. 2013;21(1):80-95. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.21.1.80.
2
The Beginning Breastfeeding Survey: measuring mothers' perceptions of breastfeeding effectiveness during the postpartum hospitalization.《母乳喂养初始情况调查》：在产后住院期间测量母亲对母乳喂养有效性的看法。
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Aug;33(4):329-44. doi: 10.1002/nur.20384.
3
Infant Feeding Attitudes and Practices of Spanish Low-Risk Expectant Women Using the IIFAS (Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale).西班牙低风险孕妇使用 IIFAS（爱荷华婴儿喂养态度量表）的婴儿喂养态度和实践。
Nutrients. 2018 Apr 22;10(4):520. doi: 10.3390/nu10040520.
4
Muslim women's attitudes toward infant feeding in Qatar: An exploration using the Iowa infant feeding attitude scale.卡塔尔穆斯林妇女对婴儿喂养的态度：使用爱荷华婴儿喂养态度量表进行的探索。
Midwifery. 2022 Nov;114:103470. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103470. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Reliability and Validity of the Reduced Spanish Version of the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale.爱荷华婴儿喂养态度量表简化西班牙语版的信度与效度
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Sep-Oct;45(5):e26-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
6
Reliability and validity of the Preterm Infant Feeding Survey: instrument development and testing.
J Nurs Meas. 2009;17(3):171-82. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.17.3.171.
7
The breastfeeding self-efficacy scale: psychometric assessment of the short form.母乳喂养自我效能量表：简表的心理测量评估
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003 Nov-Dec;32(6):734-44. doi: 10.1177/0884217503258459.
8
Breastfeeding behaviors and experiences of adolescent mothers.青春期母亲的母乳喂养行为与经历
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;31(2):106-13. doi: 10.1097/00005721-200603000-00010.
9
A prospective study of breastfeeding intentions of healthy weight and overweight women as predictors of breastfeeding outcomes.一项关于健康体重和超重女性母乳喂养意愿作为母乳喂养结果预测因素的前瞻性研究。
Midwifery. 2017 Oct;53:20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
10
The Attitudes of Polish Women towards Breastfeeding Based on the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS).基于爱荷华婴儿喂养态度量表（Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale，IIFAS）的波兰妇女母乳喂养态度。
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 30;13(12):4338. doi: 10.3390/nu13124338.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives of hospital-based nurses on breastfeeding initiation best practices.医院护士对母乳喂养启动最佳实践的看法。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;40(2):166-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01232.x.
2
2006-07 north metropolitan Perth breastfeeding cohort study: how long are mothers breastfeeding?2006 - 07年珀斯北部都会区母乳喂养队列研究：母亲们母乳喂养多长时间？
Breastfeed Rev. 2010 Jul;18(2):14-24.
3
The Beginning Breastfeeding Survey: measuring mothers' perceptions of breastfeeding effectiveness during the postpartum hospitalization.《母乳喂养初始情况调查》：在产后住院期间测量母亲对母乳喂养有效性的看法。
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Aug;33(4):329-44. doi: 10.1002/nur.20384.
4
A review of the psychometric properties of breastfeeding assessment tools.母乳喂养评估工具的心理测量特性综述。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;39(4):386-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01153.x.
5
A Western Australian survey of breastfeeding initiation, prevalence and early cessation patterns.西澳大利亚母乳喂养起始、流行和早期中断模式的调查。
Matern Child Health J. 2011 Feb;15(2):260-8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0554-2.
6
Evaluation of a breastfeeding assessment score in a diverse population.评估不同人群中的母乳喂养评估评分。
J Hum Lact. 2010 Feb;26(1):42-8. doi: 10.1177/0890334409344077. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
7
Hospital practices and women's likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed.医院的做法与女性实现纯母乳喂养意愿的可能性。
Am J Public Health. 2009 May;99(5):929-35. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.135236. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
8
Critical views on postpartum care expressed by new mothers.新妈妈对产后护理的批判性观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Nov 5;7:178. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-178.
9
Sensitive questions in surveys.调查中的敏感问题。
Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;133(5):859-83. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.
10
A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability.用于测试效度和信度的心理测量工具箱。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x.