Suppr超能文献

水果毒素对种子捕食与种子传播同属啮齿动物的生理和行为影响。

Physiological and behavioural effects of fruit toxins on seed-predating versus seed-dispersing congeneric rodents.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Exp Biol. 2013 Oct 1;216(Pt 19):3667-73. doi: 10.1242/jeb.089664. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

Abstract

Fleshy, ripe fruits attract seed dispersers but also seed predators. Although many fruit consumers (legitimate seed dispersers as well as seed predators) are clearly exposed to plant secondary compounds (PSCs), their impact on the consumers' physiology and foraging behaviour has been largely overlooked. Here, we document the divergent behavioural and physiological responses to fruit consumption of three congeneric rodent species in the Middle East, representing both seed dispersers and seed predators. The fruit pulp of the desert plant Ochradenus baccatus contains high concentrations of glucosinolates (GLSs). These GLSs are hydrolyzed into active toxic compounds upon contact with the myrosinase enzyme released from seeds crushed during fruit consumption. Acomys russatus and A. cahirinus share a desert habitat. Acomys russatus acts as an O. baccatus seed predator, and A. cahirinus circumvents the activation of the GLSs by orally expelling vital seeds. We found that between the three species examined, A. russatus was physiologically most tolerant to whole fruit consumption and even A. minous, which is evolutionarily naïve to O. baccatus, exhibits greater tolerance to whole fruit consumption than A. cahirinus. However, like A. cahirinus, A. minous may also behaviourally avoid the activation of the GLSs by making a hole in the pulp and consuming only the seeds. Our findings demonstrate that seed predators have a higher physiological tolerance than seed dispersers when consuming fruits containing toxic PSCs. The findings also demonstrate the extreme ecological/evolutionary lability of this plant-animal symbiosis to shift from predation to mutualism and vice versa.

摘要

肉质、成熟的果实吸引种子传播者,但也吸引种子捕食者。尽管许多果实消费者(合法的种子传播者和种子捕食者)显然会接触到植物次生化合物(PSCs),但它们对消费者生理和觅食行为的影响在很大程度上被忽视了。在这里,我们记录了中东三种同种啮齿动物对果实消费的不同行为和生理反应,它们代表了种子传播者和种子捕食者。沙漠植物 Ochradenus baccatus 的果肉含有高浓度的硫代葡萄糖苷(GLS)。这些 GLSs 在接触到果实消费过程中从种子中释放出的黑芥子酶时会水解成活性有毒化合物。Acomys russatus 和 A. cahirinus 共享沙漠栖息地。Acomys russatus 是 O. baccatus 的种子捕食者,而 A. cahirinus 通过口腔吐出有活力的种子来规避 GLSs 的激活。我们发现,在所检查的三个物种中,A. russatus 对整个果实的消费在生理上最耐受,甚至进化上对 O. baccatus 一无所知的 A. minous 对整个果实的消费也比 A. cahirinus 更耐受。然而,与 A. cahirinus 一样,A. minous 也可能通过在果肉上打洞并只食用种子来避免 GLSs 的激活。我们的研究结果表明,与种子传播者相比,当食用含有有毒 PSCs 的果实时,种子捕食者具有更高的生理耐受性。这些发现还表明,这种植物-动物共生关系从捕食到互惠关系的生态/进化灵活性极高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验