Gorka Stephanie M, Nelson Brady D, Sarapas Casey, Campbell Miranda, Lewis Gregory F, Bishop Jeffery R, Porges Stephen W, Shankman Stewart A
University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Psychology, 1007 West Harrison St. (M/C 285), Chicago, IL60657,
J Psychophysiol. 2013;27(2):95-104. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000091.
Research suggests that lower respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) is associated with greater aversive responding. One physiological indicator of aversive responding is startle potentiation. While a few studies have demonstrated an inverse association between RSA and startle potentiation, no study to date has distinguished whether this relation is similar for predictable versus unpredictable aversive stimuli. This is an important distinction, given that degree of predictability has been shown to be an important determinant of aversive responding. The present study examined whether resting RSA was associated with startle eye blink responding during predictable and unpredictable threat of electric shock. Resting RSA was collected during a 6-minute seated baseline phase at the beginning of the experimental session. Participants then completed a computerized startle task in which predictable and unpredictable shocks were administered. Results indicated that lower resting RSA was associated with greater startle potentiation during unpredictable threat, but not during predictable threat. These findings are consistent with a growing body of literature suggesting that individual differences in RSA are associated with aversive responding, and extend previous work by suggesting that RSA may be more robustly associated with a heightened sensitivity to unpredictable threat. This pattern of results may have implications for the understanding of pathological anxiety given that individuals with anxiety disorders typically exhibit low RSA and heightened responding during unpredictable threat.
研究表明,较低的呼吸性窦性心律不齐(RSA)与更强的厌恶反应有关。厌恶反应的一个生理指标是惊吓增强。虽然有几项研究表明RSA与惊吓增强之间存在负相关,但迄今为止,尚无研究区分这种关系对于可预测与不可预测的厌恶刺激是否相似。鉴于可预测程度已被证明是厌恶反应的一个重要决定因素,这是一个重要的区别。本研究考察了静息RSA与在可预测和不可预测的电击威胁期间惊吓眨眼反应之间是否存在关联。在实验开始时的6分钟坐姿基线阶段收集静息RSA。然后,参与者完成一项计算机化惊吓任务,在该任务中施加可预测和不可预测的电击。结果表明,较低的静息RSA与不可预测威胁期间更强的惊吓增强有关,但与可预测威胁期间无关。这些发现与越来越多的文献一致,表明RSA的个体差异与厌恶反应有关,并扩展了先前的研究工作,表明RSA可能与对不可预测威胁的更高敏感性更密切相关。鉴于焦虑症患者通常表现出低RSA以及在不可预测威胁期间反应增强,这种结果模式可能对理解病理性焦虑有影响。