Knighton Andrew J, Flood Andrew, Speedie Stuart M, Harmon Brian, Smith Patti, Crosby Carrie, Payne Nathaniel R
Research and Sponsored Programs, Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota , Minneapolis , USA .
J Asthma. 2013 Oct;50(8):821-7. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.816726. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
Accountable care puts pressure on hospitals to manage care episodes. Initial length of stay (ILOS) and readmission risk are important elements of a care episode and measures of care quality. Understanding the association between these two measures can guide hospital efforts in managing care episodes. This study was designed to explore the association between ILOS and readmission risk in a cohort of pediatric asthma patients.
The sample cohort (n = 4965) consisted of all asthma patients discharged from Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota (CHC MN) from January 2008 through August 2012. Asthma discharges included cases with a principal diagnosis of asthma or certain respiratory cases with asthma listed as a secondary diagnosis. Multiple logistic regression was used to test associations, adjusting for covariates.
Adjusting for covariates, we found no significant association between ILOS and readmission (OR: 1.04 [95% CI: 0.98-1.10]). Analyzing ILOS categorically by length of stay, one-day stays did not have a significantly higher readmission risk (OR:1.27 [95% CI: 0.87-1.85]) than two-day stays, which had the lowest observed readmission risk. Risk increased as ILOS exceeded two days but was not significantly different by day. We found no association when comparing the difference in actual versus expected ILOS and readmission risk (shorter than expected OR: 1.13 [95% CI: 0.74-1.71]; longer than expected OR: 0.97 [95% CI: 0.69-1.38]).
Attempts to prolong ILOS would dramatically increase costs with little impact on readmissions. For example, increasing one-day visits to two-day visits would increase hospital patient days 38% (1870 d) in this cohort while decreasing total readmissions by 3.8% [95% CI: 3.6-4.0%]. Understanding the mechanisms that impact readmissions is essential in evaluating cost-effective approaches to improving patient outcomes and lowering the cost of care.
accountable care给医院管理护理事件带来压力。初始住院时间(ILOS)和再入院风险是护理事件的重要要素以及护理质量的衡量指标。了解这两项指标之间的关联能够指导医院在管理护理事件方面的工作。本研究旨在探讨一组儿科哮喘患者中ILOS与再入院风险之间的关联。
样本队列(n = 4965)由2008年1月至2012年8月从明尼苏达儿童医院及诊所(CHC MN)出院的所有哮喘患者组成。哮喘出院病例包括主要诊断为哮喘的病例或某些将哮喘列为次要诊断的呼吸道病例。使用多元逻辑回归来检验关联,并对协变量进行调整。
对协变量进行调整后,我们发现ILOS与再入院之间无显著关联(比值比:1.04 [95%置信区间:0.98 - 1.10])。按住院时间对ILOS进行分类分析,一日住院的再入院风险并不显著高于两日住院(比值比:1.27 [95%置信区间:0.87 - 1.85]),两日住院的观察到的再入院风险最低。随着ILOS超过两天,风险增加,但按日计算无显著差异。在比较实际与预期ILOS及再入院风险的差异时,我们未发现关联(短于预期比值比:1.13 [95%置信区间:0.74 - 1.71];长于预期比值比:0.97 [95%置信区间:0.69 - 1.38])。
延长ILOS的尝试将大幅增加成本,而对再入院影响甚微。例如,将一日就诊增加至两日就诊将使该队列中的医院患者住院天数增加38%(1870天),同时使总再入院率降低3.8% [95%置信区间:3.6 - 4.0%]。了解影响再入院的机制对于评估改善患者预后和降低护理成本的成本效益方法至关重要。