Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Sep;96(9):6105-16. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6040. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
The public has become increasingly interested in the welfare of food animals, but the food animal industries possess few mechanisms for public engagement. Here we present results from a web-based forum designed to allow stakeholders to share views on controversial issues in dairying. In response to the question "Should dairy calves be separated from the cow within the first few hours after birth?" participants were able to indicate "yes," "no," or "neutral" and either write a reason in support of their view or select reasons provided by other participants. Four independent groups of participants were recruited (a total of 163 people); 31% said they had no involvement in the dairy industry; the remaining 69% (with some involvement in the industry) were students or teachers (33%), animal advocates (13%), producers (11%), veterinarians (9%) and other dairy industry professionals (3%). Overall, little consensus existed among participants across groups; 44% chose "yes," 48% "no," and 9% "neutral." Responses varied with demographics, with opposition to early separation higher among females, animal advocates, and those with no involvement with the dairy industry. A fifth group was recruited at a dairy industry conference (an additional 28 participants); 46% chose "yes," 32% "no," and 21% "neutral." Across all 5 groups, opponents and supporters often referenced similar issues in the reasons they provided. Opponents of early separation contended that it is emotionally stressful for the calf and cow, it compromises calf and cow health, it is unnatural, and the industry can and should accommodate cow-calf pairs. In contrast, supporters of early separation reasoned that emotional distress is minimized by separating before bonds develop, that it promotes calf and cow health, and that the industry is limited in its ability to accommodate cow-calf pairs. These results illustrate the potential of web-based forums to identify areas of agreement and conflict among stakeholders, providing a basis for the development of practices that address shared concerns.
公众对食用动物的福利越来越感兴趣,但食用动物产业几乎没有公众参与的机制。在这里,我们展示了一个基于网络的论坛的结果,该论坛旨在让利益相关者就奶牛养殖中的争议问题分享观点。在回答“犊牛是否应该在出生后的头几个小时内与母牛分开?”这一问题时,参与者可以选择“是”“否”或“中立”,并可以选择写一个支持他们观点的理由,也可以选择其他参与者提供的理由。我们招募了四个独立的参与者群体(共有 163 人);31%的人表示他们没有参与乳制品行业;其余 69%(或多或少地参与了乳制品行业)的人是学生或教师(33%)、动物权益维护者(13%)、生产者(11%)、兽医(9%)和其他乳制品行业专业人员(3%)。总的来说,各群体参与者之间几乎没有达成共识;44%的人选择“是”,48%的人选择“否”,9%的人选择“中立”。回应因人口统计学而异,反对早期分离的人在女性、动物权益维护者和没有参与乳制品行业的人中比例更高。在一个乳制品行业会议上招募了第五组参与者(另外 28 人);46%的人选择“是”,32%的人选择“否”,21%的人选择“中立”。在所有 5 个群体中,反对者和支持者经常在他们提供的理由中提到类似的问题。反对早期分离的人认为这对小牛和母牛来说是一种情绪上的压力,会损害小牛和母牛的健康,是不自然的,而且行业可以并且应该为母子牛配对提供方便。相比之下,支持早期分离的人认为,在建立联系之前将其分开可以将情绪压力降到最低,这有利于小牛和母牛的健康,并且行业在为母子牛配对提供方便方面能力有限。这些结果表明,基于网络的论坛具有识别利益相关者之间的共识和冲突领域的潜力,为制定解决共同关注问题的实践提供了依据。