Assessing physician utilization of laboratory practice guidelines: barriers and opportunities for improvement.

OBJECTIVES

To assess physician utilization of laboratory practice guidelines (LPGs)³ to improve LPG uptake and use.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A statewide survey of 4987 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 75 infectious disease (ID) specialists was conducted in 2005-2006 to correlate guideline source with users' awareness, utilization, and perceived usefulness of LPGs. We compared LPGs developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to LPGs developed by the Washington State Department of Health through its Clinical Laboratory Advisory Council (CLAC).

RESULTS

Physician awareness of LPGs was a major impediment to utilization of CLAC LPGs, and they were perceived as inaccessible, too numerous and unhelpful. However, once aware, respondents tended to use LPGs and there were no important differences in impediments or the ways CDC and CLAC LPGs were used. Of the PCPs who had a computerized physician order entry system (CPOE), a majority (92%) found, or expected that they would find, the integration of guidelines into their system helpful.

CONCLUSIONS

For both CDC and CLAC LPGs, the greatest impediments to uptake were awareness and familiarity, which depended upon LPG source, physician specialty, and practice setting. There was no apparent impediment to uptake of CLAC or CDC LPGs based upon their credibility. Because better promotion could increase uptake, CLAC LPGs are now promoted by the Washington State Medical Association. Integration of LPGs into CPOE and smart phone applications could address major impediments to clinician use. The Cabana paradigm would be useful for any organization seeking to improve LPG impact.