Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Clin Lung Cancer. 2013 Sep;14(5):508-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
The standard of care for locoregionally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation. Many patients relapse, and subsequent systemic treatment may involve platinum-doublet chemotherapy. It is not known if prior platinum-based chemoradiation influences the response to platinum-based chemotherapy given subsequently for relapse. Therefore, we compared outcomes in these patients with those in patients without prior treatment.
A retrospective study of patients who had been treated with carboplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy for de novo metastatic disease or recurrent non--small-cell lung cancer after receiving platinum-based chemoradiation. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).
A total of 104 patients were analyzed. The median age was 63 years (range, 35-81 years), with 63 (61%) patients with newly diagnosed disease and with 41 (39%) who were previously treated. The response rate was significantly lower for those previously exposed to chemoradiation (10% vs. 29%: P = .001), as was the median PFS (3.6 months vs. 5.7 months; P = .002), and median overall survival (OS) (8.6 months vs. 12.1 months; P = .007). Only the treatment group was a significant predictor (P = .032) of PFS by univariate analysis. In univariate analysis; sex (men; P = .04), histology (squamous cell; P = .04), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale (P = .002), and treatment group (P = .023) predicted significantly inferior OS. Multivariate analysis showed that performance status was the only significant predictor of inferior OS.
Outcomes were inferior in patients previously exposed to platinum-based chemoradiation. An approach of stratifying such patients in future trials of chemotherapy should be adopted. Alternative options such as non--platinum-based agents or targeted therapies should be considered in this group.
局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的标准治疗方法是同时使用铂类药物进行放化疗。许多患者会复发,随后的系统治疗可能涉及铂类药物联合化疗。目前尚不清楚先前的铂类放化疗是否会影响随后因复发而接受的铂类化疗的反应。因此,我们比较了这些患者与未接受过治疗的患者的结果。
这是一项对接受过铂类药物放化疗后接受卡铂和吉西他滨化疗治疗初诊转移性疾病或复发性非小细胞肺癌的患者进行的回顾性研究。主要结局是无进展生存期(PFS)。
共分析了 104 例患者。中位年龄为 63 岁(范围,35-81 岁),其中 63 例(61%)为初诊患者,41 例(39%)为既往治疗患者。先前暴露于放化疗的患者的缓解率显著较低(10%对 29%:P=.001),中位 PFS(3.6 个月对 5.7 个月;P=.002)和中位总生存期(OS)(8.6 个月对 12.1 个月;P=.007)也较低。仅治疗组是单变量分析中 PFS 的显著预测因素(P=.032)。单变量分析中;性别(男性;P=.04)、组织学(鳞状细胞;P=.04)、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态量表(P=.002)和治疗组(P=.023)显著预测 OS 较差。多变量分析显示,体能状态是 OS 较差的唯一显著预测因素。
先前暴露于铂类药物放化疗的患者的结果较差。在未来的化疗试验中,应该采用分层这种患者的方法。在这组患者中,应考虑替代选择,如非铂类药物或靶向治疗。