Department of Research Oncology, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jul;140(2):213-7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2609-8. Epub 2013 Jun 23.
The safety and benefits of radio-guided localization (RGL) versus wire-guided localization (WGL) surgery in the treatment of non-palpable breast cancers have been confirmed through several meta-analyses. RGL has become the standard of care in several institutions, although overall uptake has been slow. In view of this evidence supporting RGL, we believe that the future discussion is not of RGL versus WGL, but rather of what form of RGL will constitute best practice of care going forward. We therefore discuss the case for radio-guided occult lesion localization versus radioactive seed localization in the treatment of non-palpable breast cancers, is it really a toss of a coin?
通过几项荟萃分析已经证实,在治疗不可触及的乳腺癌方面,放射性引导定位(RGL)与导丝引导定位(WGL)手术的安全性和益处。RGL 已经成为多家机构的标准治疗方法,尽管总体接受程度仍然较慢。鉴于这些支持 RGL 的证据,我们认为未来的讨论不是 RGL 与 WGL 之间的选择,而是 RGL 的哪种形式将构成未来最佳的护理实践。因此,我们讨论了放射性引导隐匿性病变定位与放射性种子定位在治疗不可触及的乳腺癌方面的情况,这真的是随机选择吗?