Simpson Elizabeth A, Paukner Annika, Suomi Stephen J, Ferrari Pier F
Eunice Kennedy ShriverNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Laboratory of Comparative Ethology, Poolesville, MD; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Dev Psychobiol. 2014 May;56(4):864-70. doi: 10.1002/dev.21146. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
Previous studies suggest that about 50% of rhesus macaque infants engage in neonatal imitation of facial gestures. Here we measured whether individual differences in newborn macaques' (n = 49) visual attention may explain why some infants imitate lipsmacking (LPS) and tongue protrusion (TP) gestures. LPS imitators, but not TP imitators, looked more to a human experimenter's face and to a control stimulus compared to nonimitators (p = .017). LPS imitation was equally accurate when infants were looking at faces and when they were looking away (p = .221); TP imitation was more accurate when infants were looking at faces (p = .001). Potentially, less attention is necessary for LPS imitation compared to TP imitation, as LPS is part of macaques' natural communicative repertoire. These findings suggest that facial gestures may differentially engage imitators and nonimitators, and infants' visual attention during neonatal assessments may uncover the conditions that support this skill.
先前的研究表明,约50%的恒河猴婴儿会进行面部手势的新生儿模仿。在此,我们测量了新生猕猴(n = 49)视觉注意力的个体差异是否可以解释为什么有些婴儿会模仿咂唇(LPS)和吐舌(TP)手势。与非模仿者相比,LPS模仿者而非TP模仿者,对人类实验者的面部和对照刺激的注视更多(p = 0.017)。当婴儿看着脸和看向别处时,LPS模仿的准确性相同(p = 0.221);当婴儿看着脸时,TP模仿更准确(p = 0.001)。与TP模仿相比,LPS模仿可能需要的注意力更少,因为LPS是猕猴自然交流方式的一部分。这些发现表明,面部手势可能会以不同方式吸引模仿者和非模仿者,并且新生儿评估期间婴儿的视觉注意力可能会揭示支持这项技能的条件。