University of Minnesota.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013 Oct;38(5):1023-50. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2334889. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
After the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in March 2010 and the affirmation of its constitutionality by the Supreme Court in 2012, key decisions about the implementation of health care reform are now in the hands of states. But our understanding of these decisions is hampered by simplistic sortings of state directions into two or three simple, rigid categories. This article takes a different approach--it tracks the variations in relative state progress in implementing Medicaid expansion across a continuum of activities and steps in the decision-making process. This new measure reveals wide variation not only among states that have adopted Medicaid expansion but also among those that have rejected it but have also made progress. We use this new measure to spotlight cross-pressured Republican states that have adopted Medicaid expansion or have prepared to move forward and to explore possible explanations for implementation that extend beyond a simple focus on party control.
2010 年 3 月《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act)通过,2012 年最高法院确认其合宪性之后,医疗改革的实施关键决策现在掌握在各州手中。但是,由于各州的决策方向被简单地分为两类或三类,因此我们对这些决策的理解受到了阻碍。本文采取了不同的方法——它跟踪了在决策过程中实施医疗补助扩大计划的各种活动和步骤中相对各州进展的差异。这一新的衡量标准不仅揭示了已经采取医疗补助扩大计划的州之间,而且还揭示了已经拒绝该计划但也取得了进展的州之间的广泛差异。我们使用这一新的衡量标准来突出强调采取了医疗补助扩大计划或已准备好向前推进的受到来自两方面压力的共和党州,并探讨了实施该计划的可能解释,这些解释超出了对党派控制的简单关注。