Suppr超能文献

副肿瘤性天疱疮的实验室诊断。

Laboratory diagnosis of paraneoplastic pemphigus.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Center for Blistering Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2013 Nov;169(5):1016-24. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12479.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) is a multiorgan disease characterized by antibodies against plakins, desmogleins and the α2-macroglobulin-like-1 (A2ML1) protein, in association with an underlying neoplasm. Accurate diagnosis relies on the demonstration of these autoantibodies in serum.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the value of different laboratory techniques in the serological diagnosis of PNP.

METHODS

We performed immunoblotting, envoplakin (EP) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on rat bladder, radioactive immunoprecipitation and a nonradioactive combined immunoprecipitation-immunoblot assay. Additional assays included BP180 ELISA and BP230 ELISA. We included the sera of 19 patients with PNP and 40 control subjects.

RESULTS

The sensitivities were 63% for anti-EP ELISA, 74% for rat bladder IIF, 89% for immunoblotting, 95% for radioactive immunoprecipitation and 100% for nonradioactive immunoprecipitation. Specificities ranged from 86% to 100%. The BP180 and BP230 ELISAs had low sensitivity and specificity for PNP. The combination of rat bladder IIF and immunoblot showed 100% sensitivity and specificity. The analysis of sequential PNP sera showed that antibody titres may decrease over time, possibly resulting in negative outcomes for EP ELISA and rat bladder IIF studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of autoantibodies against EP and periplakin, or A2ML1 by immunoprecipitation is most sensitive for PNP. The combination of rat bladder IIF and immunoblotting is equally sensitive and highly specific, and represents an alternative valuable and relatively easy approach for the serological diagnosis of PNP.

摘要

背景

副肿瘤天疱疮(PNP)是一种多器官疾病,其特征是血清中存在针对桥粒斑蛋白、桥粒芯糖蛋白和 α2-巨球蛋白样-1(A2ML1)蛋白的自身抗体,同时伴有潜在的肿瘤。准确的诊断依赖于这些自身抗体在血清中的检测。

目的

评估不同实验室技术在 PNP 血清学诊断中的价值。

方法

我们进行了免疫印迹、envoplakin(EP)酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)、大鼠膀胱间接免疫荧光(IIF)、放射性免疫沉淀和非放射性联合免疫沉淀-免疫印迹试验。此外,还包括 BP180 ELISA 和 BP230 ELISA。我们纳入了 19 例 PNP 患者和 40 例对照者的血清。

结果

抗-EP ELISA 的敏感性为 63%,大鼠膀胱 IIF 的敏感性为 74%,免疫印迹的敏感性为 89%,放射性免疫沉淀的敏感性为 95%,非放射性免疫沉淀的敏感性为 100%。特异性范围为 86%至 100%。BP180 和 BP230 ELISA 对 PNP 的敏感性和特异性较低。大鼠膀胱 IIF 和免疫印迹的联合检测显示 100%的敏感性和特异性。对 PNP 连续血清的分析表明,抗体滴度可能随时间降低,导致 EP ELISA 和大鼠膀胱 IIF 研究的结果可能为阴性。

结论

通过免疫沉淀检测针对 EP 和 periplakin 或 A2ML1 的自身抗体对 PNP 最敏感。大鼠膀胱 IIF 和免疫印迹的联合检测具有相同的敏感性和高度特异性,是 PNP 血清学诊断的另一种有价值且相对简单的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验