Kelly Shane, Culican Suzanne, Silvestrini Roger A, Vu Jacinta, Schifter Mark, Fulcher David A, Lin Ming-Wei
1Department of Immunopathology, Pathology West, ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, Westmead 2Department of Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Special Care Unit, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, and Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sydney, Sydney 3Discipline of Medicine, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pathology. 2015 Jan;47(1):58-61. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000196.
Paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) is an autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering disease driven by autoantibodies against plakins expressed in mucosal epithelium. Diagnosis can be difficult as both clinical and biopsy features overlap with other blistering disorders, thus serology is important. Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on rat bladder substrate is the most widely used assay, but plakin-specific autoantibody assays have recently become available.The aim of this study was to compare the performance of five PNP assays in patients with mucosal blistering disease: IIF with rat bladder, monkey bladder and rat cardiac substrates, an envoplakin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and an envoplakin-transfected HEK cell based assay (CBA).Fifty-one patient serum samples, comprising three PNP patients and 48 disease controls, were collected along with 10 healthy control samples, and analysed using the five assays.IIF on rat and monkey bladder substrates both showed high specificity (97% and 95%, respectively), and correctly identified all three PNP sera. The envoplakin ELISA was equally specific (98%) but identified only one PNP patient. The CBA was difficult to interpret, and both this assay and IIF on rat cardiac substrate lacked specificity (82% and 83%, respectively).In this study IIF using either rat or monkey bladder substrates performed strongly, whilst the envoplakin ELISA seemed to lack sensitivity, and the CBA and IIF on rat cardiac substrate were inferior. Our findings suggest that traditional IIF-based assays remain the preferred approach in the serological diagnosis of PNP.
副肿瘤性天疱疮(PNP)是一种自身免疫性黏膜皮肤水疱病,由针对黏膜上皮中表达的桥粒斑蛋白的自身抗体驱动。由于临床和活检特征与其他水疱性疾病重叠,诊断可能会很困难,因此血清学检查很重要。大鼠膀胱底物间接免疫荧光法(IIF)是最常用的检测方法,但桥粒斑蛋白特异性自身抗体检测方法最近也已出现。本研究的目的是比较五种PNP检测方法在黏膜水疱病患者中的性能:大鼠膀胱、猴膀胱和大鼠心脏底物的IIF、一种内斑蛋白酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)以及一种基于内斑蛋白转染的人胚肾(HEK)细胞的检测方法(CBA)。收集了51份患者血清样本,包括3例PNP患者和48例疾病对照,以及10份健康对照样本,并使用这五种检测方法进行分析。大鼠和猴膀胱底物的IIF均显示出高特异性(分别为97%和95%),并正确识别了所有三份PNP血清。内斑蛋白ELISA同样具有特异性(98%),但仅识别出一名PNP患者。CBA难以解释,该检测方法和大鼠心脏底物的IIF均缺乏特异性(分别为82%和83%)。在本研究中,使用大鼠或猴膀胱底物的IIF表现良好,而内斑蛋白ELISA似乎缺乏敏感性,CBA和大鼠心脏底物的IIF较差。我们的研究结果表明,传统的基于IIF的检测方法仍然是PNP血清学诊断的首选方法。