Graduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, 1 Jen-Ai Road, Section 1, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.
Drug Saf. 2013 Aug;36(8):643-9. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0080-4.
Evidence has emerged that pioglitazone may increase the risk of bladder cancer, but the association has not been confirmed. This potential risk also has not been evaluated in users of rosiglitazone.
Using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), this large population-based nested case–control study was conducted to explore the relationship between the use of rosiglitazone or pioglitazone and risk of bladder cancer in diabetic patients.
We identified 3,412 cases of newly diagnosed bladder cancer and 17,060 controls (1:5 matched by age and sex) among a diabetic patient cohort from the NHIRD.We defined an index date for each case as the date of first hospitalization for bladder cancer. Each control was assigned the index date of their corresponding case. Multivariable conditional logistic regressions were used to estimate the association between exposure (timing and duration) to rosiglitazone or pioglitazone and bladder cancer. We defined rosiglitazone or pioglitazone exposure as ‘‘current’’ if the prescription duration covered the index date or ended at 90 days before, as ‘‘recent’’ if it ended 91–180 days before the index date, or as ‘‘past’’ if the last prescription ended more than 180 days before. Duration of rosiglitazone or pioglitazone use was defined based on the cumulative days of exposure prior to the index date: < 1, 1–2 and ≥ 2 years.
Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone use were associated with risk of bladder cancer and the associations were stronger with a longer term of exposure (pioglitazone < 1 year odds ratio [OR] 1.45 [95 % CI 1.12–1.87, p < 0.01], 1–2 years OR 1.74 [95 % CI 1.05–2.90, p = 0.03] and ≥ 2 years OR 2.93 [95 % CI 1.59–5.38, p < 0.01]; rosiglitazone < 1 year OR 0.98 [95 % CI0.82–1.17, p = 0.81], 1–2 years OR 1.78 [95 % CI 1.31–2.39, < 0.01] and ≥ 2 years OR 2.00 [95 % CI 1.37–2.92, p < 0.01]).
Long-term exposures to pioglitazone and rosiglitazone were associated with higher odds of bladder cancer, and the highest odds were seen in users with ≥ 2 years of exposure.
有证据表明吡格列酮可能会增加膀胱癌的风险,但这种关联尚未得到证实。罗格列酮使用者的这种潜在风险也尚未得到评估。
本大规模基于人群的巢式病例对照研究使用了台湾全民健康保险研究数据库(NHIRD),旨在探讨糖尿病患者使用罗格列酮或吡格列酮与膀胱癌风险之间的关系。
我们从 NHIRD 中的糖尿病患者队列中确定了 3412 例新诊断的膀胱癌病例和 17060 例对照(年龄和性别 1:5 匹配)。我们将每个病例的索引日期定义为首次因膀胱癌住院的日期。每个对照被分配了与其相应病例相同的索引日期。多变量条件逻辑回归用于估计暴露(时间和持续时间)罗格列酮或吡格列酮与膀胱癌之间的关联。如果处方持续时间涵盖索引日期或结束于 90 天之前,则将罗格列酮或吡格列酮暴露定义为“当前”;如果结束于索引日期前 91-180 天,则定义为“近期”;如果最后一次处方结束于 180 天之前,则定义为“过去”。罗格列酮或吡格列酮的使用持续时间基于在索引日期之前的累积暴露天数:<1、1-2 和≥2 年。
罗格列酮和吡格列酮的使用与膀胱癌风险相关,且暴露时间越长关联越强(吡格列酮<1 年比值比 [OR] 1.45 [95%置信区间 1.12-1.87,p<0.01],1-2 年 OR 1.74 [95%置信区间 1.05-2.90,p=0.03]和≥2 年 OR 2.93 [95%置信区间 1.59-5.38,p<0.01];罗格列酮<1 年 OR 0.98 [95%置信区间 0.82-1.17,p=0.81],1-2 年 OR 1.78 [95%置信区间 1.31-2.39,p<0.01]和≥2 年 OR 2.00 [95%置信区间 1.37-2.92,p<0.01])。
长期暴露于吡格列酮和罗格列酮与膀胱癌的几率增加相关,且暴露时间≥2 年者的几率最高。