Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Anticancer Drugs. 2013 Sep;24(8):871-7. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283637292.
The objective of this study was to carry out a meta-analysis of the efficacy of gemcitabine+platinum agent regimens in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). PubMed and Google Scholar were searched using the following combination of search terms: gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, cholangiocarcinoma, biliary, gallbladder, bile duct. Studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis if they were randomized trials on the use of gemcitabine plus a platinum agent for the treatment of advanced (unresectable or metastatic cancer) BTC. Outcomes of interest were response rate, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Pooled odds ratios/differences in median survival and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined for each outcome. A total of 47 records were identified in the initial search. Ultimately, three open-label randomized trials (two phase 2 and one phase 3) met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Two studies compared gemcitabine plus cisplatin with gemcitabine alone, whereas the other study compared gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin with fluorouracil-folinic acid. The total number of patients in the studies ranged from 54 to 410. The overall analyses revealed that all survival outcomes assessed were significantly more favorable for patients treated with gemcitabine plus platinum agents than for patients not treated with this combination. Response rates: odds ratio=2.639, 95% CI=1.210-5.757, Z=2.439, P=0.015; pooled difference in median overall survival=3.822 months, 95% CI=1.798-5.845 months, Z=3.702, P<0.001; pooled difference in median progression-free survival=3.268 months, 95% CI=1.996-4.541 months, Z=5.035, P<0.001. Patients with advanced BTC who are treated with gemcitabine plus platinum agents may experience better survival outcomes compared with patients who are not treated with this combination of chemotherapy.
本研究的目的是对吉西他滨联合铂类药物方案治疗晚期胆道癌(BTC)的疗效进行荟萃分析。使用以下搜索词组合在 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 中进行搜索:吉西他滨、奥沙利铂、胆管癌、胆道、胆囊、胆管。如果研究是关于吉西他滨联合铂类药物治疗晚期(不可切除或转移性癌症)BTC 的随机试验,则符合荟萃分析的纳入标准。感兴趣的结局包括反应率、总生存率和无进展生存率。为每个结局确定了汇总的优势比/中位数生存差异和 95%置信区间(CI)。最初的搜索共确定了 47 条记录。最终,三项开放标签随机试验(两项 2 期,一项 3 期)符合入选标准,并纳入荟萃分析。两项研究比较了吉西他滨联合顺铂与吉西他滨单药治疗,而另一项研究比较了吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂与氟尿嘧啶-亚叶酸。研究中的患者总数从 54 到 410 不等。总体分析表明,接受吉西他滨联合铂类药物治疗的患者的所有生存结局均明显优于未接受该联合治疗的患者。反应率:优势比=2.639,95%CI=1.210-5.757,Z=2.439,P=0.015;中位总生存差异的总和=3.822 个月,95%CI=1.798-5.845 个月,Z=3.702,P<0.001;中位无进展生存差异的总和=3.268 个月,95%CI=1.996-4.541 个月,Z=5.035,P<0.001。与未接受该化疗联合治疗的患者相比,接受吉西他滨联合铂类药物治疗的晚期 BTC 患者可能有更好的生存结局。