Fernandez-Fernandez Eva M, Pardo-De la Vega Rafael, Amigo-Bello Cristina, Solis-Sanchez Gonzalo
Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital de Cabueñes, Camino de los Prados 395, Gijón (Asturias), Spain.
Rev Neurol. 2013 Jul 1;57(1):9-16.
AIM. Bibliometric analysis of neuropaediatrics articles published in Revista de Neurologia and Anales de Pediatria between 2000 and 2009. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We selected neuropaediatrics articles published in two journal during the last decade (n = 1,085). We investigated authorship, topic and bibliography, to calculate indices of isolation, Price, collaboration, productivity, transience and self-citations. Analyze citations received by Web of Knowledge (WOK): articles cited, sometimes cited and h-index. RESULTS. 1,085 articles were analyzed, 255 published in Anales de Pediatria (9.4% of the total in that period) and 830 in Revista de Neurologia (21.7% total). The collaboration index was 4.3. The 89.7% of the authors were medical care (96% hospital staff, 0,8% of primary care staff and 2.9% of both). The 11.9% ??of the articles were collaborative between regions and the 26% came from foreign centers. The originals were 29.8% (80.8% descriptive observational studies, analytical 18.3% and 0.8% clinical trials). The most frequent topics were paroxysmal disorders (15.9%) and developmental, learning and behavioral disorders (15%). The average number of citations per article was 27.6, with an isolation rate of 13.4% and a Price index of 41.7%. The profile of the articles published in both journals is different, finding significant differences in almost all parameters analyzed. According WOK, the 255 items of Anales de Pediatria have received 40 citations and h-index of 3 and the 830 Revista de Neurologia 2,234 citations with h-index of 13. CONCLUSIONS. There are differences in the pediatric neurology publications between the two magazines with more international projection of Revista de Neurologia.
目的。对2000年至2009年间发表在《神经学杂志》和《儿科学年鉴》上的神经儿科学文章进行文献计量分析。材料与方法。我们选取了过去十年间在这两本期刊上发表的神经儿科学文章（n = 1085）。我们调查了作者身份、主题和参考文献，以计算孤立指数、普赖斯指数、合作指数、生产力指数、瞬变指数和自引率。分析科学网（WOK）收录的文章被引情况：被引文章、有时被引文章和h指数。结果。共分析了1085篇文章，其中255篇发表在《儿科学年鉴》上（占该时期总数的9.4%），830篇发表在《神经学杂志》上（占总数的21.7%）。合作指数为4.3。89.7%的作者从事医疗工作（96%为医院工作人员，0.8%为基层医疗人员，2.9%为两者兼有）。11.9%的文章是地区间合作的，26%来自国外中心。原创文章占29.8%（80.8%为描述性观察性研究，分析性研究占18.3%，临床试验占0.8%）。最常见的主题是发作性疾病（15.9%）和发育、学习及行为障碍（15%）。每篇文章的平均被引次数为27.6次，孤立率为13.4%，普赖斯指数为41.7%。两本期刊发表文章的概况不同，在几乎所有分析参数上都存在显著差异。根据科学网的数据，《儿科学年鉴》的255篇文章获得了40次引用，h指数为3；《神经学杂志》的830篇文章获得了2234次引用，h指数为13。结论。两本杂志在儿科神经学出版物方面存在差异，《神经学杂志》的国际影响力更大。
