Suppr超能文献

在东巴尔的摩,获得全面门诊护理是否会改变未参保患者的急诊科就诊模式?

Does access to comprehensive outpatient care alter patterns of emergency department utilization among uninsured patients in East Baltimore?

作者信息

Block Lauren, Ma Sai, Emerson Matthew, Langley Anne, Torre Desiree de la, Noronha Gary

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):143-7. doi: 10.1177/2150131913477116. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The annual number of emergency department (ED) visits in the United States increased 23% between 1997 and 2007. The uninsured and those with chronic medical conditions are high users of emergency care.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether access to comprehensive outpatient primary and specialty care and care coordination provided by The Access Partnership (TAP) reduced ED utilization among uninsured patients relative to patients who chose not to enroll.

METHODS

Multiple time series analysis was performed to examine rates of ED utilization and inpatient admission among TAP patients and a comparison group of eligible patients who did not join (non-TAP patients). Monthly ED utilization and inpatient admission rates for both groups were examined prior to and subsequent to referral to TAP, within a study period 2007-2011.

RESULTS

During the study period, 623 patients were eligible to enroll, and 374 joined the program. Rates of ED visits per month increased in both groups. Compared with non-TAP patients, TAP patients had 2.0 fewer ED visits not leading to admission per 100 patient-months post-TAP (P = .03, 95% confidence interval = 0.2-3.9). TAP status was a moderate predictor of ED visits not leading to admission, after controlling for age, gender, and zip code (P = .04, 95% confidence interval = 0.1-3.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Although overall ED utilization did not change significantly between program participants and nonparticipants, TAP patients had a lower rate of ED visits not resulting in inpatient admission relative to the comparison group.

摘要

背景

1997年至2007年间,美国急诊科就诊的年人次增加了23%。未参保者和患有慢性疾病的人是急诊护理的高使用者。

目的

我们试图确定,与未选择登记的患者相比,通过“准入伙伴关系”(TAP)提供的全面门诊初级和专科护理及护理协调服务,是否能降低未参保患者的急诊利用率。

方法

进行了多次时间序列分析,以检查TAP患者以及未加入的合格患者对照组(非TAP患者)的急诊利用率和住院率。在2007 - 2011年的研究期内,对两组患者转诊至TAP之前和之后的每月急诊利用率和住院率进行了检查。

结果

在研究期间,623名患者有资格登记,374名患者加入了该项目。两组的每月急诊就诊率均有所上升。与非TAP患者相比,TAP患者在转诊至TAP后每100患者月中未导致住院的急诊就诊次数少2.0次(P = 0.03,95%置信区间 = 0.2 - 3.9)。在控制了年龄、性别和邮政编码后,TAP状态是未导致住院的急诊就诊的中度预测因素(P = 0.04,95%置信区间 = 0.1 - 3.9)。

结论

尽管项目参与者和非参与者之间的总体急诊利用率没有显著变化,但与对照组相比,TAP患者未导致住院的急诊就诊率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验