• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在东巴尔的摩,获得全面门诊护理是否会改变未参保患者的急诊科就诊模式?

Does access to comprehensive outpatient care alter patterns of emergency department utilization among uninsured patients in East Baltimore?

作者信息

Block Lauren, Ma Sai, Emerson Matthew, Langley Anne, Torre Desiree de la, Noronha Gary

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):143-7. doi: 10.1177/2150131913477116. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1177/2150131913477116
PMID:23799723
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The annual number of emergency department (ED) visits in the United States increased 23% between 1997 and 2007. The uninsured and those with chronic medical conditions are high users of emergency care.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether access to comprehensive outpatient primary and specialty care and care coordination provided by The Access Partnership (TAP) reduced ED utilization among uninsured patients relative to patients who chose not to enroll.

METHODS

Multiple time series analysis was performed to examine rates of ED utilization and inpatient admission among TAP patients and a comparison group of eligible patients who did not join (non-TAP patients). Monthly ED utilization and inpatient admission rates for both groups were examined prior to and subsequent to referral to TAP, within a study period 2007-2011.

RESULTS

During the study period, 623 patients were eligible to enroll, and 374 joined the program. Rates of ED visits per month increased in both groups. Compared with non-TAP patients, TAP patients had 2.0 fewer ED visits not leading to admission per 100 patient-months post-TAP (P = .03, 95% confidence interval = 0.2-3.9). TAP status was a moderate predictor of ED visits not leading to admission, after controlling for age, gender, and zip code (P = .04, 95% confidence interval = 0.1-3.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Although overall ED utilization did not change significantly between program participants and nonparticipants, TAP patients had a lower rate of ED visits not resulting in inpatient admission relative to the comparison group.

摘要

背景

1997年至2007年间,美国急诊科就诊的年人次增加了23%。未参保者和患有慢性疾病的人是急诊护理的高使用者。

目的

我们试图确定,与未选择登记的患者相比,通过“准入伙伴关系”(TAP)提供的全面门诊初级和专科护理及护理协调服务,是否能降低未参保患者的急诊利用率。

方法

进行了多次时间序列分析,以检查TAP患者以及未加入的合格患者对照组(非TAP患者)的急诊利用率和住院率。在2007 - 2011年的研究期内,对两组患者转诊至TAP之前和之后的每月急诊利用率和住院率进行了检查。

结果

在研究期间,623名患者有资格登记,374名患者加入了该项目。两组的每月急诊就诊率均有所上升。与非TAP患者相比,TAP患者在转诊至TAP后每100患者月中未导致住院的急诊就诊次数少2.0次(P = 0.03,95%置信区间 = 0.2 - 3.9)。在控制了年龄、性别和邮政编码后,TAP状态是未导致住院的急诊就诊的中度预测因素(P = 0.04,95%置信区间 = 0.1 - 3.9)。

结论

尽管项目参与者和非参与者之间的总体急诊利用率没有显著变化,但与对照组相比,TAP患者未导致住院的急诊就诊率较低。

相似文献

1
Does access to comprehensive outpatient care alter patterns of emergency department utilization among uninsured patients in East Baltimore?在东巴尔的摩,获得全面门诊护理是否会改变未参保患者的急诊科就诊模式?
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):143-7. doi: 10.1177/2150131913477116. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
2
The effects of a community-based partnership, Project Access Dallas (PAD), on emergency department utilization and costs among the uninsured.基于社区的伙伴关系——达拉斯项目接入(PAD)对无保险人群急诊利用和成本的影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Dec;34(4):577-83. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds027. Epub 2012 May 31.
3
Linking uninsured patients treated in the emergency department to primary care shows some promise in Maryland.在马里兰州,将在急诊科接受治疗的未参保患者与初级保健联系起来显示出了一些希望。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 May;34(5):796-804. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1102.
4
Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: focus on injury-related emergency department utilization and expenditures.美国儿童和青少年医疗保健年度报告:关注与伤害相关的急诊科就诊情况及支出
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):219-240.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.03.032. Epub 2008 May 27.
5
Identifying patient, community and program specific barriers to free specialty care utilization by uninsured patients in East Baltimore.识别巴尔的摩东部未参保患者在使用免费专科护理方面存在的患者、社区和项目特定障碍。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013 May;24(2):688-96. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0085.
6
An evaluation of statewide emergency department utilization following Tennessee Medicaid disenrollment.田纳西州医疗补助计划停保后全州急诊部门利用情况评估。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;18(11):1121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01204.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
7
Program for uninsured cuts ED visits, admissions.针对未参保者的项目减少了急诊就诊和住院人数。
Hosp Case Manag. 2012 Oct;20(10):154-5.
8
Intensive intervention improves primary care follow-up for uninsured emergency department patients.强化干预可改善未参保急诊科患者的初级保健随访情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;12(7):647-52. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.02.015.
9
Magnitude of national ED visits and resource utilization by the uninsured.无保险人群的国家急诊就诊人次和资源利用情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;31(4):722-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
10
Evaluation of New York State's Child Health Plus: access, utilization, quality of health care, and health status.纽约州儿童健康增强计划评估:医疗服务的可及性、利用率、质量及健康状况
Pediatrics. 2000 Mar;105(3 Suppl E):711-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-emergency department (ED) interventions to reduce ED utilization: a scoping review.非急诊部门(ED)干预措施以减少 ED 利用:范围综述。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01028-4.
2
Comprehensive Cardiac Care: How Much Does It Cost?全面心脏护理:费用是多少?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 11;20(6):4980. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064980.
3
The Financial Impact of a Partnership Between an Academic Medical Center and a Free Clinic.学术医疗中心与免费诊所合作的财务影响。
Am J Med. 2021 Nov;134(11):1389-1395.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
4
Effect of an emergency department education and empowerment intervention on uncontrolled hypertension in a predominately minority population: The AHEAD2 randomized clinical pilot trial.急诊科教育与赋权干预对以少数族裔为主的人群中未控制高血压的影响:AHEAD2随机临床试验
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Mar 2;2(2):e12386. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12386. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Persistently Frequent Emergency Department Utilization Among Persons With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮患者频繁急诊就诊的持续性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Nov;71(11):1410-1418. doi: 10.1002/acr.23777. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
6
Public Health, Hypertension, and the Emergency Department.公共卫生、高血压与急诊科
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016 Jun;18(6):50. doi: 10.1007/s11906-016-0654-5.
7
Pain, distress, and anticipated recovery for older versus younger emergency department patients after motor vehicle collision.机动车碰撞后老年与年轻急诊科患者的疼痛、痛苦及预期恢复情况
BMC Emerg Med. 2014 Dec 30;14:25. doi: 10.1186/s12873-014-0025-y.
8
Primary care availability and emergency department use by older adults: a population-based analysis.老年人的初级保健可及性与急诊科使用情况:一项基于人群的分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Sep;62(9):1699-706. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12984. Epub 2014 Aug 14.