• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

借助探地雷达估算活垃圾填埋场内的含水量。

Estimating water content in an active landfill with the aid of GPR.

机构信息

Region of Waterloo Waste Management Division, 925 Erb Street West, Waterloo, ON N2J 3Z4, Canada.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2013 Oct;33(10):2015-28. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.020
PMID:23800648
Abstract

Landfill gas (LFG) receives a great deal of attention due to both negative and positive environmental impacts, global warming and a green energy source, respectively. However, predicting the quantity of LFG generated at a given landfill, whether active or closed is difficult due to the heterogeneities present in waste, and the lack of accurate in situ waste parameters like water content. Accordingly, ground penetrating radar (GPR) was evaluated as a tool for estimating in situ water content. Due to the large degree of subsurface heterogeneity and the electrically conductive clay cap covering landfills, both of which affect the transmission of the electromagnetic pulses, there is much scepticism concerning the use of GPR to quantify in situ water content within a municipal landfill. Two landfills were studied. The first landfill was used to develop the measurement protocols, while the second landfill provided a means of confirming these protocols. GPR measurements were initially completed using the surface GPR approach, but the lack of success led to the use of borehole (BH) GPR. Both zero offset profiling (ZOP) and multiple offset gathers (MOG) modes were tried, with the results indicating that BH GPR using the ZOP mode is the most simple and efficient method to measure in situ water content. The best results were obtained at a separation distance of 2m, where higher the water content, smaller the effective separation distance. However, an increase in water content did appear to increase the accuracy of the GPR measurements. For the effective separation distance of 2m at both landfills, the difference between GPR and lab measured water contents were reasonable at 33.9% for the drier landfill and 18.1% for the wetter landfill. Infiltration experiments also showed the potential to measure small increases in water content.

摘要

由于填埋气 (LFG) 对环境具有负面影响和正面影响,分别是全球变暖问题和绿色能源,因此受到了极大的关注。然而,由于废物存在不均匀性,并且缺乏准确的原位废物参数(如水含量),因此很难预测给定垃圾填埋场(无论是活跃的还是封闭的)产生的 LFG 量。因此,评估了探地雷达 (GPR) 作为原位含水量估算的工具。由于地下存在很大程度的不均匀性和覆盖垃圾填埋场的导电粘土帽,这两者都会影响电磁脉冲的传输,因此人们对使用 GPR 来定量测量城市垃圾填埋场内的原位含水量存在很大的怀疑。研究了两个垃圾填埋场。第一个垃圾填埋场用于开发测量协议,而第二个垃圾填埋场提供了确认这些协议的方法。最初使用表面 GPR 方法完成 GPR 测量,但由于缺乏成功,转而使用钻孔 (BH) GPR。尝试了零偏移距剖面 (ZOP) 和多偏移距采集 (MOG) 模式,结果表明,使用 ZOP 模式的 BH GPR 是测量原位含水量的最简单,最有效的方法。在分离距离为 2m 时可以获得最佳结果,在该距离下,含水量越高,有效分离距离越小。但是,含水量的增加似乎确实提高了 GPR 测量的准确性。对于两个垃圾填埋场的有效分离距离为 2m,GPR 和实验室测量的含水量之间的差异在较干燥的垃圾填埋场为 33.9%,在较潮湿的垃圾填埋场为 18.1%,这是合理的。渗透实验还表明有潜力测量含水量的微小增加。

相似文献

1
Estimating water content in an active landfill with the aid of GPR.借助探地雷达估算活垃圾填埋场内的含水量。
Waste Manag. 2013 Oct;33(10):2015-28. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
2
Uncontrolled methane emissions from a MSW landfill surface: influence of landfill features and side slopes.垃圾填埋场表面未控制的甲烷排放:垃圾填埋场特征和边坡的影响。
Waste Manag. 2013 Oct;33(10):2108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.032. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
3
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) responses for sub-surface salt contamination and solid waste: modeling and controlled lysimeter studies.探地雷达(GPR)对地下盐分污染和固体废物的响应:建模与控制型蒸渗仪研究
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Feb;189(2):57. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5770-4. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
4
Stable isotope signatures for characterising the biological stability of landfilled municipal solid waste.用于表征填埋城市固体废物生物稳定性的稳定同位素特征。
Waste Manag. 2013 Oct;33(10):2083-90. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
5
Enhanced GPR data interpretation to estimate in situ water saturation in a landfill.增强 GPR 数据解释以估算垃圾填埋场中的原位水饱和度。
Waste Manag. 2021 Feb 1;120:175-182. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.033. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
6
Comparison between lab- and full-scale applications of in situ aeration of an old landfill and assessment of long-term emission development after completion.原位曝气在旧垃圾填埋场的实验室和全尺寸应用比较及完工后长期排放发展评估。
Waste Manag. 2013 Oct;33(10):2061-73. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
7
Gravimetric water distribution assessment from geoelectrical methods (ERT and EMI) in municipal solid waste landfill.基于地电方法(ERT和EMI)的城市固体废弃物填埋场重量法水分分布评估
Waste Manag. 2016 Sep;55:129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
8
LCA and economic evaluation of landfill leachate and gas technologies.垃圾渗滤液和沼气技术的生命周期评价与经济评估。
Waste Manag. 2011 Jul;31(7):1532-41. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.02.027. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
9
Long-term ground penetrating radar monitoring of a small volume DNAPL release in a natural groundwater flow field.在天然地下水流场中对小体积重质非水相液体泄漏进行长期探地雷达监测。
J Contam Hydrol. 2008 Apr 4;97(1-2):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
10
Environmental impact assessment of leachate recirculation in landfill of municipal solid waste by comparing with evaporation and discharge (EASEWASTE).渗滤液回灌对垃圾填埋场环境影响的评估:蒸发和排放(EASEWASTE)的比较。
Waste Manag. 2013 Feb;33(2):382-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining an experimental study and ANFIS modeling to predict landfill leachate transport in underlying soil-a case study in north of Iran.结合实验研究与自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)建模预测填埋场渗滤液在下层土壤中的运移——以伊朗北部为例
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Dec 16;190(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6374-8.