Suppr超能文献

忽略的问题:对 IRB 改革的额外需求。

What the ANPRM missed: additional needs for IRB reform.

机构信息

Center for Mental Health Services at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Summer;41(2):390-6. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12050.

Abstract

Institutional Review Boards are mandated to carry out the requirements of the Common Rule, and it is widely agreed that they are appropriate and necessary mechanisms to ensure the ethical conduct of human research. In this paper, we suggest that the changes proposed in ANPRM, although generally helpful, fail to take into consideration how IRBs actually review applications and therefore do not adequately address some of the problems that may be leading to ineffective human subject protection.

摘要

机构审查委员会被授权执行共同规则的要求,人们普遍认为,它们是确保人类研究符合伦理规范的适当和必要的机制。在本文中,我们认为,ANPRM 中提出的这些变化虽然总体上是有帮助的,但没有考虑到机构审查委员会实际上是如何审查申请的,因此没有充分解决可能导致人类受试者保护无效的一些问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验