• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用参与式设计为互联开放研究伦理(CORE)公共知识库提供信息。

Using Participatory Design to Inform the Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE) Commons.

机构信息

School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, PO Box 875603, Tempe, AZ, 85287-5603, USA.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr #0404, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):183-203. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00086-3. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-019-00086-3
PMID:30725245
Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) research involving pervasive sensors, mobile apps and other novel data collection tools and methods present new ethical, legal, and social challenges specific to informed consent, data management and bystander rights. To address these challenges, a participatory design approach was deployed whereby stakeholders contributed to the development of a web-based commons to support the mHealth research community including researchers and ethics board members. The CORE (Connected and Open Research Ethics) platform now features a community forum, a resource library and a network of nearly 600 global members. The utility of the participatory design process was evaluated by analyzing activities carried out over an 8-month design phase consisting of 86 distinct events including iterative design deliberations and social media engagement. This article describes how participatory design yielded 55 new features directly mapped to community needs and discusses relationships to user engagement as demonstrated by a steady increase in CORE member activity and followers on Twitter.

摘要

移动健康(mHealth)研究涉及普遍存在的传感器、移动应用程序和其他新颖的数据收集工具和方法,带来了新的伦理、法律和社会挑战,特别是在知情同意、数据管理和旁观者权利方面。为了解决这些挑战,采用了参与式设计方法,让利益相关者为开发一个支持移动健康研究社区的基于网络的公共资源做出贡献,包括研究人员和伦理委员会成员。CORE(连接和开放研究伦理)平台现在具有一个社区论坛、一个资源库和一个由近 600 名全球成员组成的网络。通过分析为期 8 个月的设计阶段中进行的 86 项不同活动,包括迭代设计审议和社交媒体参与,评估了参与式设计过程的效用。本文描述了参与式设计如何产生 55 个直接映射到社区需求的新功能,并讨论了与用户参与的关系,这表现在 CORE 成员活动和 Twitter 关注者的稳步增加上。

相似文献

1
Using Participatory Design to Inform the Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE) Commons.运用参与式设计为互联开放研究伦理(CORE)公共知识库提供信息。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):183-203. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00086-3. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
2
Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age: Introducing Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE), a Tool for Researchers and Institutional Review Boards.数字时代的伦理导航:引入连接与开放研究伦理(CORE),一种供研究人员和机构审查委员会使用的工具。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 8;19(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6793.
3
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
mHealth Research Applied to Regulated and Unregulated Behavioral Health Sciences.移动医疗研究在受监管和不受监管的行为健康科学中的应用。
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Mar;48(1_suppl):49-59. doi: 10.1177/1073110520917029.
5
Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.未经患者同意的数据与组织研究:对新西兰研究伦理委员会观点的定性研究
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):143-153. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1518938.
6
Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.制定医疗保健中实用临床试验的伦理设计和实施框架:混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Sep 27;19(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2895-x.
7
Engaging research participants to inform the ethical conduct of mobile imaging, pervasive sensing, and location tracking research.吸引研究参与者以指导移动成像、普适传感和位置跟踪研究的伦理行为。
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):577-586. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0426-4.
8
A quantitative study of attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability: Do stakeholders agree?一项关于成年人智力残疾者参与研究的态度的定量研究:利益相关者是否达成一致?
Disabil Health J. 2018 Jul;11(3):345-350. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
9
Strengthening stakeholder engagement through ethics review in biomedical HIV prevention trials: opportunities and complexities.通过生物医学 HIV 预防试验中的伦理审查加强利益攸关方的参与:机会与复杂性。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Oct;21 Suppl 7(Suppl Suppl 7):e25172. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25172.
10
The Value of Including People with Dementia in the Co-Design of Personalized eHealth Technologies.将痴呆症患者纳入个性化电子健康技术共同设计的价值。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;47(3):164-175. doi: 10.1159/000497804. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical, legal, and social implications of digital health: A needs assessment from the Society of Behavioral Medicine to inform capacity building for behavioral scientists.数字健康的伦理、法律和社会影响:来自行为医学学会的需求评估,以告知行为科学家的能力建设。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Feb 23;14(3):189-196. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad076.
2
Lessons Learned: Beta-Testing the Digital Health Checklist for Researchers Prompts a Call to Action by Behavioral Scientists.经验教训:对研究人员的数字健康清单进行测试促使行为科学家采取行动。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 22;23(12):e25414. doi: 10.2196/25414.
3
"Data is the new oil": citizen science and informed consent in an era of researchers handling of an economically valuable resource.

本文引用的文献

1
NIH support of mobile, imaging, pervasive sensing, social media and location tracking (MISST) research: laying the foundation to examine research ethics in the digital age.美国国立卫生研究院对移动、成像、普适传感、社交媒体和位置跟踪(MISST)研究的支持:为审视数字时代的研究伦理奠定基础。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Jan 15;1:20171. doi: 10.1038/s41746-017-0001-5. eCollection 2018.
2
Health Research with Big Data: Time for Systemic Oversight.大数据健康研究:进行系统性监督的时候了。
J Law Med Ethics. 2018 Mar;46(1):119-129. doi: 10.1177/1073110518766026. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
3
Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives.
“数据是新的石油”:公民科学与知情同意在研究人员处理具有经济价值资源的时代
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2021 Dec 10;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40504-021-00118-6.
4
Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?大数据研究的伦理审查:哪些应保留,哪些应改革?
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 30;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00616-4.
5
Precision Health: The Role of the Social and Behavioral Sciences in Advancing the Vision.精准医疗:社会和行为科学在推进精准医疗愿景中的作用。
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Nov 1;54(11):805-826. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa018.
使用普适传感及其他新兴技术进行研究的伦理与监管挑战:机构审查委员会的观点
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Oct-Dec;8(4):266-276. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1403980.
4
Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards.社会计算研究中的伦理规范:审视机构审查委员会的作用。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Dec;12(5):372-382. doi: 10.1177/1556264617725200. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
Acceptance of Mobile Health in Communities Underrepresented in Biomedical Research: Barriers and Ethical Considerations for Scientists.生物医学研究中代表性不足社区对移动健康的接受度:科学家面临的障碍与伦理考量
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Jun 28;5(6):e87. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6494.
6
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.基于深度神经网络的皮肤癌皮肤科医生级分类。
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118. doi: 10.1038/nature21056. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
7
Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science.重新构想21世纪科学背景下的人类研究保护措施。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 22;18(12):e329. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6634.
8
Engaging research participants to inform the ethical conduct of mobile imaging, pervasive sensing, and location tracking research.吸引研究参与者以指导移动成像、普适传感和位置跟踪研究的伦理行为。
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):577-586. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0426-4.
9
A Survey of Mobile Phone Sensing, Self-Reporting, and Social Sharing for Pervasive Healthcare.面向普适医疗的手机传感、自我报告及社交分享调查
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jan;21(1):218-227. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2483902. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
10
Computer vision tools for low-cost and noninvasive measurement of autism-related behaviors in infants.用于低成本、非侵入性测量婴儿自闭症相关行为的计算机视觉工具。
Autism Res Treat. 2014;2014:935686. doi: 10.1155/2014/935686. Epub 2014 Jun 22.