Matthews Lynda R, Harris Lynne M, Jaworski Alison, Alam Ashraful, Bozdag Gokcen
Ageing, Work and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Australian College of Applied Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Work. 2014;49(2):271-9. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131660.
Labour force participation of people with mental disorders varies according to the nature of their disorder. Research that compares function and psychosocial need in job-seekers with different mental disorders, however, is scant especially in the Australian setting. Identifying rehabilitation needs of job-seekers with mental disorders receiving employment services is of interest to providers of disability employment services in Australia.
This study sought to identify differences in health, social needs and function in people with anxiety, mood, or psychotic disorders accessing disability employment services to inform disability service providers of vocational rehabilitation interventions.
106 adult job-seekers with anxiety (29%), mood (51%), and psychotic (20%) disorders receiving job placement services from a disability employment service provider consented to participate in this study.
Self-report measures and the Executive Interview (EXIT) were used to document function. Differences between disorders were determined using one-way analysis of variance.
Significantly better estimates of social functioning as measured by the Behaviour and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-32) were reported by job-seekers with psychotic disorders compared to those with anxiety or mood disorders. However, job-seekers with psychotic disorders reported longer periods of unemployment compared to those with mood disorders and longer estimates of the time it would take to obtain work compared to both the other groups.
Perceived psychosocial problems, such as poor social function in job-seekers with anxiety and mood disorders and perceptions of poor employability in those with psychotic disorders, should be considered when developing vocational rehabilitation interventions, or where additional support may be required once employment is obtained.
精神障碍患者的劳动力参与率因其障碍的性质而异。然而,比较不同精神障碍求职者的功能和心理社会需求的研究很少,尤其是在澳大利亚的背景下。确定接受就业服务的精神障碍求职者的康复需求对澳大利亚的残疾就业服务提供者来说很有意义。
本研究旨在确定焦虑、情绪或精神病性障碍患者在接受残疾就业服务时的健康、社会需求和功能差异,以便为残疾服务提供者提供职业康复干预措施提供信息。
106名患有焦虑症(29%)、情绪障碍(51%)和精神病性障碍(20%)的成年求职者,他们从一家残疾就业服务提供者那里接受工作安置服务,并同意参与本研究。
使用自我报告测量法和行政访谈(EXIT)来记录功能。使用单因素方差分析确定不同障碍之间的差异。
与患有焦虑或情绪障碍的求职者相比,患有精神病性障碍的求职者在行为和症状识别量表(BASIS-32)上报告的社会功能估计值明显更好。然而,与患有情绪障碍的求职者相比,患有精神病性障碍的求职者报告的失业时间更长,并且与其他两组相比,他们预计获得工作所需的时间更长。
在制定职业康复干预措施时,或者在获得就业后可能需要额外支持的情况下,应考虑到感知到的心理社会问题,例如焦虑和情绪障碍求职者的社会功能差,以及精神病性障碍求职者的就业能力差的看法。