School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (SD, NJW, AEA)
Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK (AJS)
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):597-606. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13487604.
We introduce the series of 7 tutorial papers on evidence synthesis methods for decision making, based on the Technical Support Documents in Evidence Synthesis prepared for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Decision Support Unit. Although oriented to NICE's Technology Appraisal process, which examines new pharmaceutical products in a cost-effectiveness framework, the methods presented throughout the tutorials are equally relevant to clinical guideline development and to comparisons between medical devices, or public health interventions. Detailed guidance is given on how to use the other tutorials in the series, which propose a single evidence synthesis framework that covers fixed and random effects models, pairwise meta-analysis, indirect comparisons, and network meta-analysis, and where outcomes expressed in several different reporting formats can be analyzed without recourse to normal approximations. We describe the principles of evidence synthesis required by the 2008 revision of the NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal and explain how the approach proposed in these tutorials was designed to conform to those requirements. We finish with some suggestions on how to present the evidence, the synthesis methods, and the results.
我们介绍了一系列关于决策证据综合方法的教程论文,这些论文基于为英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)决策支持部门编写的证据综合技术支持文件。尽管这些方法主要面向 NICE 的技术评估过程,该过程在成本效益框架内评估新药,但贯穿这些教程的方法同样适用于临床指南制定以及医疗器械或公共卫生干预措施的比较。我们提供了详细的指导,介绍如何使用该系列中的其他教程,这些教程提出了一个单一的证据综合框架,涵盖固定效应模型和随机效应模型、成对荟萃分析、间接比较和网络荟萃分析,以及可以在不使用正态逼近的情况下分析以几种不同报告格式表示的结果。我们描述了 2008 年 NICE 技术评估方法指南修订版所需的证据综合原则,并解释了这些教程中提出的方法如何设计符合这些要求。最后,我们提出了一些关于如何呈现证据、综合方法和结果的建议。