The Miriam Hospital/Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, USA.
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Mar;22(3):638-44. doi: 10.1002/oby.20526. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
Weight loss programs are often conducted in a group format, but it is unclear whether weight losses or adherence cluster within treatment group and whether characteristics of the group (e.g., size or homogeneity) affect outcomes. We examined these questions within Look AHEAD, a multicenter study of the effects of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) in overweight/obese individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Weight losses and adherence (attendance, use of meal replacement products, and minutes of activity) were examined over one year of intervention in 2329 ILI participants in 209 treatment groups, which all received the same weight loss program.
Weight losses did not cluster among members of a treatment group (intra-class correlation [ICC] of 0.007), whereas measures of adherence had small/moderate clustering (ICCs of 0.05-0.11). The 209 groups varied in weight losses, with a mean of 8.64% (SD = 2.35%, interquartile range = 6.82%, 10.32%), but neither size nor baseline homogeneity of members affected the outcome.
Although these findings suggest that it may not be necessary to control for clustering in behavioral weight loss studies, they also indicate that merely treating individuals in groups is not sufficient to harness social influences on weight loss.
减肥计划通常以小组形式进行,但目前尚不清楚体重减轻或坚持是否在治疗组内聚集,以及小组的特征(例如,大小或同质性)是否会影响结果。我们在 LOOK AHEAD 中研究了这些问题,这是一项针对 2 型糖尿病超重/肥胖个体强化生活方式干预(ILI)效果的多中心研究。
在 209 个治疗组的 2329 名 ILI 参与者中,在 ILI 的一年干预期间,检查了体重减轻和坚持(出勤率、使用代餐产品以及活动分钟数)情况,所有治疗组均接受了相同的减肥计划。
治疗组的成员之间体重减轻没有聚集(组内相关系数 [ICC]为 0.007),而坚持措施存在小/中度聚集(ICC 为 0.05-0.11)。209 个组的体重减轻情况有所不同,平均为 8.64%(SD=2.35%,四分位距=6.82%,10.32%),但成员的大小和基线同质性均不影响结果。
尽管这些发现表明,在行为减肥研究中可能不必控制聚类,但它们也表明,仅在小组中治疗个体不足以利用社会影响来减轻体重。