Suppr超能文献

巴西女性样本中体脂指数预测体脂肪的有效性。

Validity of body adiposity index in predicting body fat in a sample of Brazilian women.

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Federal Institute for Education, Sciences and Technology, Rio Pomba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Dec;21(12):E696-9. doi: 10.1002/oby.20543. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to verify the validity of BAI in predicting %BF in a sample of Brazilian women

DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 102 women (average age 60.3 ± 9.8) were assessed. To determine percentage body fat (% BF), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used as the "gold standard." To evaluate the association between body adiposity index (BAI) and % BF assessed by DXA, we used Pearson's correlation coefficient. Paired sample t-test was used to test differences in mean % BF between BAI and DXA. To evaluate the concordance between % BF measured by DXA and estimated by BAI, we used the Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and the agreement analysis of Bland-Altman.

RESULTS

The correlation between % BF obtained by DXA and that estimated by BAI was r = 0.65, P < 0.001. Paired t-test showed significant mean difference between methods (P < 0.0001). Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was C_b = 0.73, which is classified as poor, while the Bland-Altman plots showed BAI underestimating % BF in relation to the used criterion measure in a large portion of the sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the present study show that BAI presented low agreement with % BF measured by DXA, which is not recommended for % BF prediction in this studied sample.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证 BAI 在预测巴西女性样本中 %BF 的有效性。

设计和方法

共评估了 102 名女性(平均年龄 60.3±9.8 岁)。为了确定体脂肪百分比(%BF),采用双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)作为“金标准”。为了评估身体脂肪指数(BAI)与 DXA 评估的 %BF 之间的相关性,我们使用了 Pearson 相关系数。使用配对样本 t 检验来检验 BAI 和 DXA 测量的平均 %BF 之间的差异。为了评估 DXA 测量的 %BF 和 BAI 估计值之间的一致性,我们使用了 Lin 的一致性相关系数和 Bland-Altman 的一致性分析。

结果

DXA 获得的 %BF 与 BAI 估计的 %BF 之间的相关性为 r = 0.65,P<0.001。配对 t 检验显示两种方法之间存在显著的均值差异(P<0.0001)。Lin 的一致性相关系数 C_b=0.73,属于较差水平,而 Bland-Altman 图显示 BAI 在很大一部分样本中低估了与使用标准测量方法相关的 %BF。

结论

本研究结果表明,BAI 与 DXA 测量的 %BF 之间的一致性较低,不建议在本研究样本中预测 %BF。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验